Types of Debate
Debate Breakdown
More to the Case
Fallacies Fallout
Lack of Logic
100

A two-on-two debate that involves the proposal of a plan by the affirmative team to enact a policy, while the negative team offers reasons to reject that proposal.

Policy Debate

100

the topic being debated.


Resolution

100

Mislead or give false impression of something or someone. Distort information taking away credibility.


Misrepresent

100

citing an expert in one area as an expert in another area


False Authority

100

appeal to what is popular or to the crowd.


Ad Populum 

200

A quick-moving, 20 min one-on-one format consisting of two students who will argue a specified topic with limited prep time.

Extemporaneous Debate

200

An opposing team member may request information from the speaker (who may decline).

Point of Information

200

reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity.

Logic

200

stating only two interpretations or actions as the only alternatives, ignoring anything in the middle

Either-or-reasoning

200

stating an idea meant to conceal or mislead

Smoke Screen

300

a simulation of the U.S. legislative process, students generate a series of bills and resolutions for debate.


Congressional Debate

300

note taking during a debate; accurately recording the principle arguments and rebuttals

Flowing/Flow Chart/Flow Sheet

300

These are the people who support and don't support the resolution in the debate. (Also known as pro and con).


Affirmative and Negative

300

appeal to pity or misery

Ad Misericordia

300

argument based on one/a few examples; using all instance when only some apply


Hasty generalization

400

involves opposing teams of two, debating a current event topic.

Public Forum

400

an opportunity for one debater to ask the other questions that are relevant and designed to get admissions or concessions from the other.

Cross-examination

400

a mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound argument; a failure in reasoning that renders an argument invalid.

Fallacy

400

implying that because one event followed another, the first event must have caused the second

Post Hoc

400

using appeal of spokesman or someone famous to promote an idea rather than rely on the traits of the idea

Ad Vericundium

500

A 45 min one-on-one format where students debate topics ranging from individual freedom versus the collective good to economic development versus environmental protection.

Lincoln-Douglas

500

a set of reasons, supporting facts, and arguments that shows why we should affirm or negate the resolution

Case

500

Special Question: A notation of sources used in a debate case or essay.

Citations

500

the arguer creates a weaker false argument for the opponent, one that can easily be defeated


Straw man argument

500

This is the other name for Either-or Reasoning.


Black or White Fallacy or False Dilemma 

M
e
n
u