GENERAL 1
GENERAL 2
NEGLIGENCE
DEFAMATION
DAMAGES
100

The legal responsibility of a party for the loss suffered by another party. 

Civil Liability

100

Breaking or failing to fulfil a duty or obligation. 

Breach. 

100

The Snail in the Bottle case helped establish this principle as a way of explaining a person's duty of care. 

The Neighbour Principle.

100

The limitation of actions in regards to a defamation case being brought to the court. 

One year from the date of the publication of the statement. 
100

The definition of a remedy. 

A legal solution to a breach of civil law. 
200

The wronged person bringing a matter to the court. 

Plaintiff.

200

When the actions of the defendant caused/resulted in the harm suffered by the plaintiff. 

Causation. 

200

The FOUR elements that must be proved when bringing an action for negligence. 

1. The person who was negligent owed a duty of care to the person injured. 

2. The duty of care was breached. 

3. The breach of duty of care directly caused loss or damage. 

4. Harm or loss was the result of the breach of the duty of care. 

200

The main purpose of the law of defamation. 

Protect the character and reputation of individuals against attempts to discredit them or lower their reputation. 

200

The most common form of remedy in civil cases. 

Damages. 

300

The party alleged to be in the wrong.

Defendant. 

300

The restriction on bringing a civil claim after the allowed time. 

Limitation of actions. 

300

Two defences to negligence. 

1. Contributory negligence.

2. Assumption of risk.

300
A possible defence to defamation when the defamatory statements are made within the same context as statements that are substantially true and do not further harm the plaintiff's reputation. 

Contextual truth. 

300

The THREE types of damages that fall under the banner of compensatory damages.

1. Special damages

2. General damages

4. Aggravated damages

400

The party which holds the burden of proof in civil matters.

The plaintiff. 

400

A person or company contracted to compensate another in the event of damage or loss. 

Insurers. 

400

A person owes a duty of care if these THREE elements are present. 

1. The risk was foreseeable. 

2. The risk was significant. 

3. A reasonable person in the same circumstances would have taken precautions to eliminate risk. 

400
The FIVE elements that must be shown to prove defamation has occurred. 

1. A statement is defamatory

2. The statement is untrue 

3. The statement refers to the plaintiff

4. The defendant published the defamatory statement

5. The publication caused or is likely to cause serious harm

400
The definition of an injunction.

A non-financial remedy. An order where the defendant is required to do or not do something. 

500

The standard of proof required in civil matters. 

On the balance of probabilities. 
500

When somebody becomes responsible for the actions of another.

Vicarious liability. 

500

Four exceptions when a duty of care is not owed. 

1. Participating in a risky recreational activity. 

2. A good Samiratan. 

3. Donations of food. 

4. Volunteers. 

500

A defence to defamation that protects people who may unknowingly distribute defamatory information, such as printing companies, booksellers, libraries etc. 

Innocent dissemination. 

500

The definition of special damages. 

Damages to compensate for loss that can be accurately measured in monetary terms (e.g. loss of wages and medical costs). 

M
e
n
u