Definitions
Details of The Study
Homograph, Homonym, or unambiguous?
Results/Conclusion
100

The meaning of words 

Semantics

100

How many deaf participants and how many hearing participants were there?

20 deaf and 20 hearing participants

100

Bass 

Homograph

100

True or False: hearing participants had a significant difference between homonyms and unambiguous words.

False

200

words spelled the same, but sound different (bass vs bass)

Homographs

200

Name at least one thing that was required of all deaf participants.

used spoken communication for everyday life, were aurally habilitated, attended non deaf schools, had been enrolled in speech therapy

200

Guitar 

Unambiguous

200

True or False: With Deaf participants, a major difference was found between homonyms and unambiguous words.

True

300

conventions for writing a language (spelling)

Orthography

300

What were the three types of Hebrew nouns?

homographs, homonyms, and unambiguous

300

Right

Homonym

300

Deaf group: What is word recognition driven by? 

Orthography

400

ability to recognize/manipulate spoken words (recognition of rhymes, alliteration, syllables, etc.)

Phonological Awareness

400

How much reaction time did the participant have before the next letter string was shown?

2,000 ms

400

Spring

Homonym

400

Hearing group: _____ effects are more pronounced than ______ effects. 

phonological; semantic

500
A theory where orthographic, phonological, and semantic processes are connected and assist with word recognition 

The "triangle model" of word recognition

500

How did the study work? 

Hebrew letter string is shown to participants and they had to make a decision on whether the word was real or not. 

500
Subject

Homograph

500

_______ effects = comparing processing of homographs/homonyms 

Phonological 

M
e
n
u