Four Walls Investigation
EMV Transaction
APPLY THIS DENIAL
100

What is the purpose of performing a Four Walls investigation in cases of unauthorized transactions?

By validating case facts, identify established patterns and confirming authorized activity

100

Enrtry Mode for EMV transaction

"5"

100

The cardholder claims they have never done business
with the disputed merchant

Transaction History

200

Why is it important to analyze transaction details when conducting a Four Walls investigation?

These details are essential for determining whether to proceed with a denial, write-off, or a possible chargeback.

200

Possible supporting denial for EMV transaction

Matching geographical location of transaction and cardholder

200

The card was lost or stolen

Undisputed/Authorized Card Present Transactions

300

How does geographical location factor into the investigation of disputed EMV transactions?

It helps analysts piece together the sequence of events during the disputed period and assess where those events took place.

300

Strong denial for EMV transaction

No evidence of card separation

300

The cardholder has made three or more transactions with the same merchant, regardless of the transaction amount

Spending Pattern

400

What role does establishing a pattern play in the investigation of unauthorized transactions?

A baseline of normal behavior

400

A transaction require the secure one-time code to be able to process a transaction successfully

EMV Contactless

400

The card is in the cardholder's possession and was never reported as lost or stolen and then found

EMV Denial

500

How do you differentiate between strong and weak evidence within the Four Walls framework?

Strong evidence is clear, consistent, and directly supports the case through reliable data while weak evidence is inconsistent, or lacks direct relevance, making it less credible for the investigation.

500

What are the indicators that no fraud occurred when handling card-in-possession for a card-present transaction?

No evidence of card separation

No suspicious declined transactions

No difference in spend patterns

500

At least three details about the cardholder match over the phone, such as email, phone number, or address

Validation of Ducoments

M
e
n
u