What Actually Counts as a Crime?
Who Gets Blamed – and Why?
Can Crime Really Be Prevented?
What Can Police Actually Do?
100

What are the two essential elements usually required to establish criminal liability?

Actus reus (the physical act) and mens rea (the mental element).

100

Who is the principal in the first degree?

The person who physically commits the crime.

100

What is situational crime prevention?

Strategies that reduce opportunities for crime by making it more difficult, risky or less rewarding.

100

What legislation provides NSW police with their main powers?

 The Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) (LEPRA).

200

What is meant by actus reus in criminal law?

Actus reus refers to the physical act or omission that constitutes the crime.

200

What is an accessory before the fact?

A person who assists, plans or encourages the crime before it is committed but is not present at the scene.

200

Identify one example of situational crime prevention and explain how it reduces crime.

CCTV cameras increase surveillance, which raises the risk of detection and discourages offending.

200

What is the purpose of a search warrant?

A search warrant authorises police to search a specific location when there are reasonable grounds to suspect evidence of a crime is present.

300

Explain why mens rea is usually required in addition to actus reus to establish a crime.  

Mens rea ensures that a person had a guilty mind (such as intention or recklessness). This prevents people from being punished for purely accidental actions and helps ensure fairness in the criminal justice system.

300

Explain why the law distinguishes between principals and accessories.

The law distinguishes between levels of involvement to reflect different degrees of moral culpability and responsibility. This ensures punishment is proportionate to a person’s role in the offence.

300

Explain how social crime prevention attempts to reduce criminal behaviour.

Social crime prevention addresses underlying causes of crime, such as poverty, lack of education and unemployment, aiming to reduce long-term offending.

300

Explain why police powers are subject to legal limits.

Limits prevent abuse of power, protect individual rights, and uphold the rule of law while still allowing police to maintain community safety.

400

A driver accidentally exceeds the speed limit because they did not see the sign. Explain why they may still be criminally liable.

Speeding is a strict liability offence, meaning mens rea does not need to be proven. The prosecution only needs to prove the act occurred, so the driver may still be liable even without intention.

400

A person provides a weapon knowing it will be used in a robbery but is not present at the crime scene. Identify their role and justify your answer.

They are an accessory before the fact because they knowingly assisted in the planning of the crime but were not present when it occurred.

400

Compare situational and social crime prevention in terms of effectiveness

Situational prevention is often effective in the short term by reducing immediate opportunities, while social prevention aims for long-term reduction by addressing root causes. Both play complementary roles.

400

Assess whether stop-and-search powers without a warrant can be justified.

These powers can be justified where police have reasonable suspicion and community safety is at risk. However, they must be used carefully to avoid discrimination or infringement of civil liberties.

500

Analyse why strict liability offences exist and assess whether they are fair in balancing community safety and individual rights.

Strict liability offences exist to promote public safety and efficiency, particularly in regulatory areas such as traffic or workplace safety. While they enhance compliance and deterrence, they may be criticised for limiting individual rights because they punish without proving intent. However, they are generally considered justified where community protection outweighs the need to prove fault.

500

Assess whether holding accessories criminally liable promotes justice.

Holding accessories liable promotes justice by recognising that crime is often collaborative and deterring people from assisting offenders. It reflects moral responsibility beyond the person who commits the act. However, justice requires careful distinction between levels of involvement to avoid disproportionate punishment.

500

Evaluate the effectiveness of crime prevention strategies in achieving long-term reductions in crime.

Crime prevention strategies can reduce crime, but their effectiveness varies. Situational methods may displace crime, while social methods require significant time and resources. Long-term effectiveness is greatest when both approaches are combined.

500

Evaluate the extent to which police powers balance individual rights and community safety.

Police powers are essential for crime control and public protection, but safeguards such as warrants, judicial oversight and the right to silence help protect individual rights. While tensions remain, the legal framework aims to strike a balance between security and liberty.

M
e
n
u