Theory
These are two categories of off-case positions a 2ac could read conditionality bad on
counterplans & kritiks
Framework is meant to establish one of these, rather than a ceiling
a floor
If I get overwhelmed prepping my 2ac vs. a kritik at the camp tournament I should write this on my K flow to help me remember what to say
POSTAL
The Supreme Court is going to hear a case featuring this person vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
Thomas E. Dobbs
Mrs. Ivey showed a video clip from this movie as a good example of a legal cross-x
Legally Blonde
If the 1nc says the status of the counterplan is dispositional, this is the next cross-x question the 1a should ask
Often, framework is a reasonable 1nc option if the 1ac does not do this (multiple possible answers, choose 1)
defend instrumental affirmation of the resolution, read a plan text, utilize the US federal government as their agent to enact change
There are 3 kritiks in the starter packet including the cap k and these other 2
Heidegger, Water Colonialism
Although there are 9 Supreme Court justices, these are the 2 that matter for our DA
Their ideal 2nr
A 2ac on dispo bad should include offense, this, and a remedy for the judge
an interpretation of what the neg should have done instead
Much like Topicality, a Framework 1nc often defines words in the resolution. The most common word usually they define is this
USFG / US federal government
Against any Kritik a good 2ac will read some offense, which could be a link turn or this
impact turn
Jackson / upholding reproductive rights
When unfamiliar with a kritik in the 1nc, the 1a should ask the 1n questions about any of these 4 things (4 correct answers, choose 1)
This is the minimum amount of time a 1ar should extend condo bad if they want it to be a viable 2ar way to win
Much like with Topicality, a Framework 1nc or 2nc/1nr might say there is the way the aff should have changed their affirmative so that the neg could have been better prepared. This change is often called this
Topical Version of the affirmative
The 1ar is allowed to read new evidence on the Kritik as long as this is true
The 2ac already made an argument/read evidence on the issue the 1ar wants to read evidence on
The DA has a variety of choices for impacts including court packing, court clog, freedom, stem cells, polarization, and this
overpopulation
this is the speaker the 2a cross-x'es
This is how long the 2ar should extend condo bad if they want to win the whole debate on it
5 mins / whole speech
A commonly read evidence author on Framework is this person
Erikson 3
The 2ar against any Kritik serves to consolidate the debate, also sometimes known as this, which happens to be a term in public forum debate
Final focus
The court politics DA could be a net benefit to this counterplan (multiple correct answers, choose 1)
executive cp, congress cp, states cp, interstate compacts cp, potentially incentives cp
In cross x if I am the question asker I should be looking at this person when I ask my questions
The judge