Generally
Insane Delusion & Contest Remedies
Undue Influence
Atty as Beneficiary
Fraud & Mistake
100

Who has motive to contest

Heirs who would benefit through intestacy 

Beneficiary of prior will 

100

Definition 

Testator believes a state of supposed facts that do not exist & no rational person would believe 
100

Basic Elements

Influence 

Subvert testator's mind 

Causation 

100

Impact on gift 

The gift will most likely be void

100

Fraud in the Factum

Testator decieved as to identity of contents of instrument 

200

Who has standing? 

AN interested person: spouse, heir, beneficiary, etc

200

Will Contest Remedies 

Denial of Probate 

Partial invalidity 

200

The burden

The burden is on the contestants to prove undue influence

200
What gifts are deemed void 

To atty or supervising atty

To parent of atty

To descendant of parent of atty

To employee of atty 

To spouse of anyone above 

200

Elements of Fraud

False Representation to Testator

Knowledge of falsity 

T reasonably believes representation 

Causation 

300

What people contest on? 

Lack of legal capacity 

Lack of Testamentary capacity 

Lack of testamentary intent 

Failure to comply with formalities

300

Constructive Trust 

equitable remedy to prevent unjust enrichment 

300

Effect of Mere Opportunity 

Mere opportunity is not enough. You need more than influence and opportunity. Need to lack the ability to resist 

300

Impact on the gift in Texas

The gift may not automatically void but attorney subject to discipline 

300

Mistake in the inducment

Testator mistaken as to extrinsic fact and makes will based on that fact 

400

Which parties must a contestant tell these parties about the contest? 

Institution of Higher education or Charities 

400

Nexus Requirement

Even if testator had an insane delusion, will remains valid unless insane delusion impacts property disposition 

400

Types of Circumstantial Evidence 

Unnatural Disposition 

Oppurtunity

Relationship

Susceptibility/ability to resist 

Benefificary connected with preparation 

400

Exceptions to Atty as beneficiary 

B is Testator's spouse

B is Testator's ancestor

B is testator's descendant 

B is related to testator within 3rd degree

400

Scrivner's Error

Statute was added to allow for reformation to correct mistakes veen if the will in unambiguous if it can be shown by clear and convincing evidence that the testator's intent and the terms of will were affected by a mistake of fact or law in either expression or in inducement 

500

Statute of Limitation on Tolling

Two years from when an incapacitated person's disabilities removed 

500

Innocent Heirs in a Constructive Trust 

The innocent heirs of the deceased lost their share as well - Pope v Garrett 

500

Mortmain Statute

Staute which limits gifts to charity under specified circumstances 

Texas does not have one because it is likely unconstitutional 

500

Texas Rule of Professional Conduct 1.8 (c) 

The attorney will be subject to discipline for drafting a will and having themselves as a beneficiary 

500

Public Policy 

To have a pubic policy violation, it must be from the four corners of the will to bring it up. You cannot put an illegal condition in a will 

- May not disinherit someone for no reason 

M
e
n
u