PJ
What case established the following language, "Certain minimum contacts with the forum such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice?
What is International Shoe Co v. Washington
In what case did the court decide that you could not plead an anticipated federal defense and have federal question jurisdiction?
What is Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley?
What is the minimum diversity authority and what is the complete diversity authority?
What is Article 3 and 28 USC 1332?
what kind of joined aprties can plaintiffs not assert claims over if they ruin diversity jurisdiction under 28 USC 1367(b)?
What are intervenors, required/compulsory parties, permissive parties, and impleader parties? (14, 19, 20, and 24)
What is the case that illustrates notice pleading?
What is Conley v. Gibson?
From what rule does a district court utilize the same jurisdiction in the state court in which the federal district court sits?
What is FRCP (4)(k)(1)?
What is the name of the rule where a complaint must pose a federal question under federal law?
What is the well-pleaded complaint rule?
In what case is there a peeping tom landlord?
What is Mas v. Perry?
A complaint is filed in state A. Can Plaintiff from state A remand a case back to state court if defendant from state B filed a notice of removal to state B?
No! Proper venue for removal is the federal district court located in the state where the original case was filed (I am sorry I know this Q sucks but it was on adaptibar)
What are the facts of Bell Atlantic v. Twombly?
Antitrust between Bell Atlantic and other telephone companies. Twombly alleging conspiracy for antitrust and only had evidence that the big phone carriers engaged in unfair parallel conduct to stop small carriers from growing and big carriers had an implied agreement amongst each other.
What do we call the statute that allows a court to obtain personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant on the basis of certain acts committed by an out-of-state defendant?
What is a state long arm statute?
What case is our example for permissing federal question jurisdiction over state claims with a federal ingredient? (200 Point Bonus: Can you tell us what the disputed federal issue was? 400 point Bonus: Can you tell us what are the four required elements for allowing the federal ingredient? ---you can get 100 points per element only if you tell us what contract theory makes sense that you get 100 points for your performance)
What is Grable & sons v. Darue Engineering? (200 Point Bonus: The federal issue was whether the IRS failed to give proper notice to the plaintiff when they seized his property for tax delinquency) (400 Point Business: (1) Necessarily raise a stated federal issue; (2) actually disputed; (3) Substantial--important federal issue; and (4) A federal forum may entertain the issue with disturbing the balance of federal and state judicial responsibilities. (Contracts: Promissory Estoppel)
What critical rules regarding domicile do we get from Mas v. Perry?
What is the rule for domicile(true, fixed, permanent home whcih a person intends to return); Change of domicile: (1) residence in a different domicile and (2) intent to remain there; Presumption of domicile: Domicile persists until it is changed.
In what circumstances may a federal court decline supplemental jurisdiction over a state-law issue?
What are: (1) raise novel or complex issue of state law; (2) state claim substantially predominates; (3) DC dismissed all claims over which it had OG jurisdiction; (4) in exceptional circumstances, other compelling reasons.
What are thh facts of Iqbal?
FBI investigated individuals that were “high interest” due to 9/11 attacks. Iqbal claimed discrimination and unlawful detainment due to his race after the 9/11 attacks. Iqbal did not bring enough facts to support his claims to move them from the conceivable to the plausible.
What case established that minimum contacts are sufficient so long as they "relate to" the claim presented by the plaintiff, even if the contacts did not cause the claim?
What is Ford Motor v. Montana?
What authorities grant district courts the power to hear federal question cases?
What is Article 3 and 28 USC 1331?
What rule lists a corporation's principal place of business as the place where the corporation maintains its headquarters so long as it is the actual center of direction, control, and coordination?
What is the "nerve center" test
What should you consider first when inquiring whether a claim needs to be added for supplemental jurisdiciton?
What is whether it arose from the same case/controversy or common nucleus of operative fact?
What are the requirements of Rule 8(a) to have a sufficient pleading?
A short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction, unless the court already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new jurisdictional support;
A short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; and
A demand for the relief sought, which may include relief in the alternative or different types of relief.
What is Argentina? (Bonus: The court decided that there was no general personal jurisdiction because Daimler's in-state activities were not "continuous and systematic" enough to render them at home in California. Paradigmatically, state of incorporation and PPOB are the opinion recognized locations for general personal jurisdiction.)
Anna sues Amanda for tort of battery because they fist fought over allegations that Amanda violated the Fair Housing Act for refusing to rent her one of her studio apartments and finding out she gave it to someone far older and would not rent to her because she is 23. Assume that age discrimination against younger individuals is a novel federal issue and the parties disagree. Is there federal question jurisdiction over Anna's suit?
Perhaps, based on the holding in Grable & Sons v. Darue, state claims with a federal ingredient suffice for FQJ. Here, it was (1) necessarily raised; (2) actually disputed; (3) substantial, and (4) arguably capable of resolution without dispute because it may be a one-off claim since the issue is novel but can be argued that battery is too critical of a state claim to give the federal court jurisdiction over the case.
Quhyn is domiciled in CA and Emily is domiciled in NY (or Gale and Herb). Quhyn is in the process of moving from CA to NY to hang out with Emily more but in the process of moving her things from a U-Haul to her new apartment they get into a scuffle because Emily realizes Quhyn has defrauded her into buying hella Disney stock right as it was tanking and Quhyn was supposed to get a massive cash-out from Mickey Mouse if she induced you to buy. During the scuffle Quhyn says she does not want to live in New York and still has a renewable apt lease in CA. Assume amount in controversy met and Quhyn is served while in CA. Where is Quhyn domiciled and fraud is a state claim.
Honestly give me your best argument I want to hear this.
Of the two requirements listed in diversity jurisdiction (diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy) which one was determined not necessary to be met to have supplemental jurisdiction over a claim?
What is the amount in controversy?
Can you give us the Twiqbal 2-step?
We all know it, I am not typing all that.