SCOTUS Cases
Constitution
Legal Concepts
Historic Events
Assorted
100

Brown vs Board of Education (1954): ruling & constitutional justification

Ruled that by the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment separating children in public schools on the basis of race was unconstitutional.

100

Article I, Article II, Article III (must get all right to get points)

Legislature, executive, judicial branches set up (respectively)

100

Rule of law

All persons, institutions, and entities are accountable to following laws, nobody is above the law.

100

American Revolution (countries & changes in governance)

American movement for independence from Great Britain, establishing a new democratic republic in place of Britain's monarchy

100

Gerrymandering

Process of redrawing legislative boundaries for the purpose of benefitting a certain party

200

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022): Ruling and constitutional justification

Ruled abortion is neither a constitutional nor fundamental right implied by the Fourteenth Amendment's right to personal liberty

200

14th Amendment

Right to equal protection and due process under the law

200

Limited government

Government only has those powers delegated to it by law, often through a written constitution, and its authority is restricted by the law.

200

Federalist Papers

Series of essays written in favor of the proposed Constitution and more centralized government authority following the Articles of Confederation

200

Due process

Government must follow certain procedures (like a fair trial) before they may deprive a person of a protected life, liberty, or property interest.

300

Baker vs Carr (1962): Ruling and constitutional justification

Supreme Court indeed has jurisdiction over redrawing elector districts in the interest of promoting equal protection (14th Amendment)

300

Supremacy Clause

Federal laws constitute the "supreme Law of the Land" and take priority over any conflicting state laws

300

Federalism

System of government controlled by two levels: federal and state/local. Generally, national government is responsible for broader governance, while the smaller subdivisions, states, and cities govern the issues of local concern.

300

Magna Carta

1215 English royal charter of rights, first document to put into writing the principle that the king and his government were not above the law. 

300

Soft power

Diplomatic power attained through the use of cultural attractiveness (like protests or rallying massive international public support) rather than the threat of coercive action

400

Texas vs. Johnson (1989): Ruling and justification

Ruled that burning the American flag as an act of protest is protected under the First Amendment. Forms of protest, even if controversial, are constitutionally protected in the U.S.

400

9th Amendment

Right to unenumerated rights (i.e. rights not listed explicitly in the Constitution don't necessarily not exist)

400

Habeas corpus

Person under arrest must be brought before a judge or into court, innocent until proven guilty.

400

1936 Berlin Olympics

Nazis hide evidence of anti-Semitism and promote Aryan ideology during Games, Black man named Jesse Owens wins 6 medals and Hitler storms out

400

6th Amendment

Right to speedy and fair trial 

500

Gibbons vs Ogden (1824): R&J

National government has exclusive power over interstate commerce, negating state laws interfering with the exercise of that power under the Commerce Clause.

500

Article I, Sections 2 and 3 (must get both right)

Set structure of representation for House and Senate (proportional for House, equal for Senate, respectively)

500

Justiciability

Types of matters that a court can adjudicate (rule on)

500

Murder trial of Samuel Sheppard

SCOTUS ruled that Sheppard did not receive a fair trial due to the Cleveland television media's repeated broadcasts of Sheppard's confession, the hostile media coverage, and the physical arrangement of the courtroom which facilitated collaboration between the prosecution and media

500

Rucho vs. Common Cause: R&J

Ruled that partisan gerrymandering claims are non-justiciable (cannot be determined in federal courts, too political): no clear, manageable standard for determining when partisan gerrymandering goes too far, can only be addressed at the state level thru elections. Effectively made partisan gerrymandering legal in most cases at the federal level (application of federalism)