Singular Self-Awareness
What is ownership?
The constant normative pressure to share the same attitude as others
What is joint commitment?
The logical fallacy that Margaret Gilbert's Plural subject theory suffers from
There is a normative stance that: I cannot believe P and not-P at the same time
The idea that the group and its members have a sense that some attitudes are theirs
What is shared perspective?
The logical fallacy that the content/object account runs into. This fallacy is found in Michael Bratman's "We J" argument
Circular argument
The mediated attitude in which the subject makes itself the object of reflection
What is self-reflection?
When the attitudes of the participants constitute parts to a whole
What is collective sharing?
The feature of collective intentionality that relies on joint attitudes i.e., a "we-feeling"
What is mode?
The structure that is often assigned a central and constitutive role
What is self-awareness?
The change and instability of this results in plural self-awareness differing in depth and degree
What is a social situation that provides a base for plural self-awareness?
The point of view which comes with a special authority and is a kind of "I-talk"
What is a first person point of view?
Some authors suggest that this is the way in which we reason on how we are able to distinguish between an object and our own attitudes towards it
What is meta-representation?
The presupposition of this is the background awareness of plural selfhood
What is joint attention?
Philip Pettit failed to incorporate this into their basic action theoretic framework?
What is their conception of plural self-awareness?