Define "Logical Fallacy"
A poor form of reasoning in which the argument does not follow a progression based on facts and evidence
If you walk in the rain, you will get wet
It is raining
Therefore, you are wet
Invalid! The argument does not establish that you are walking
All bachelors are unmarried men
John is an unmarried man
Therefore, John is a bachelor
Yes! General > Specific valid example
What is valid but false
You can identify fallacies of relevance by analyzing this part of an argument
Manchester United and Tottenham played a match.
Either Manchester United or Tottenham won the game
Invalid! They tied - because not all games have a winner and loser.
All thrift stores sell used clothes
This shirt is from a thrift store
Therefore, this shirt is used
Yes! General > Specific valid argument
Invalid! You cannot know the conclusion from the premise.
An argument has a fallacy of weak induction when
the evidence is too poor to support the conclusion
Earl is having allergies
Earl has a dog
Invalid! It does not say ALL of Earl's allergies are caused by dogs
Socrates is a man
all men are mortal
Therefore Socrates is mortal
No! This goes from a specific example to a general, then back to specific. It's valid but not deductive
What is valid and logical and not always true
Unwarranted assumptions happen when
an argument requires acceptance of something that requires further justification
If you spend all day in the sun
You will get sunburned
Susan wants to bake a cake, but she doesn't have any flour. Susan knows that to bake a cake, she needs flour. Since she has no flour, she cannot bake a cake.
Yes! Even though we see the "Susan wants..." in the argument, it still goes from General > Specific and is valid deductive reasoning
It has rained every day so far this month.
If it has rained every day so far this month, then probably it will rain today.
Therefore, probably it will rain today.
What is yes, this is an inductive argument
An argument tries to distract
-If someone lives in Brooklyn, they live in New York
-If someone lives in New York, they live in the United States
-Alexis lives in Brooklyn, therefore Alexis lives in the United States
Valid!!
What is valid and logical!
What is a valid inductive argument?