1
2
3
3
4
100

Convenant of Seisen

the grantor promises that he ownes the estate which he pro-ports to convey

100

coant of futher assurances

will take all future steps necessary and reasonable to cure title defects that existed at closing 

100

Conservation easement

Restricts the development and use of servient land in order to preserve open spaces, farmland, histroical sites, or undevloped land 

100

Reinstatement

a borrower can avoid foreclosure by paying the missed payments before the lender accelerates the loan

100

O→     to A for 10 years, then to B and his heirs.


A:        Present interest in an estate for a term of years

B:        Vested remainder in FSA (assuming B is alive)


200

Conanent of right to convey

Grantor promises that he has the right to convey  title 

200

Race J

The purchaser who records first have priority 

200

Preasault v. U.S

  • In order to establish an abandonment there must be acts by the owner of the dominant tenement conclusively and unequivocally manifesting either a present intent to relinquish the easement or a purpose inconsistent with its future existence
200

equitable redemption

Where a transaction is a sale in form, but the parties intend it to be a mortgage, the court will treat it as a matter of equity

200

O→     to A for life, then to B and her heirs if B survives A, and if B does not survive A to C and his heirs.


A:        Present interest in a life estate

B:        Contingent remainder in FSA (contingent because it is subject to the condition precedent that B must survive A.)

C:        Alternative contingent remainder in FSA (contingent because it is subject to the condition that B not survive A)

O:        Reversion in FSA

RAP applies first to C’s contingent remainder, which is valid because C’s interest must vest, that is, the condition must disappear within the perpetuities period.  That will happen because the condition depends on the death and survival of lives in being.  RAP also applies to B’s contingent remainder and is valid for the same reason.


300

Covnet agsinst encumbrances 

Grantor promises that there are noncumbrances on the title other than those that were expressed in the deed

300

Notice J

The subsequent purchaser who has no notice of the prior interest is a BFP and thus has priority 

300

Lomeyer v. bower 

  • IF YOU HAVE AN UNDISCLOSED PUBLIC ENCUMBRANCE IT DOES NOT MAKE IT UNMARKETABLE, BUT IF THERE IS A MAJOR VIOLATION OF THIS IT WOULD MAKE IT UNMARKETABLE
300

Foreclosure sale

  • Foreclosure eliminates or “wipes out” the mortgage being foreclosed and all junior interests, but does not affect senior interests
  • Foreclosure sales proceeds are distributed first to the foreclosing lender, and then to junior interests in order of priority; any surplus proceeds go to the borrower


300

O→     to A for life, then to B for life.

A:        Present interest in a life estate

B:        Vested remainder in a life estate (assuming B is alive)

O:        Reversion in FSA

400

covnt of warranty 

Grantor promises that he will defend against any claim of superior title
400

Race- notice J

the sub purchaser who has both no notice and records first is BFP

400

Unmarketable if

The sellers interest less than what she proports to sell; subject to an encumbrance; reasonable doubt about either 

400

RPP

Forever vest or never within 21 years

400

O→     to A for life, then to B and her heirs if B survives A.

A:        Present interest in a life estate

B:        Contingent remainder in FSA (because B must satisfy the condition that s/he survive A to take the estate.)

O:        Reversion in FSA

RAP applies to the B’s future interest, but the interest is valid because B cannot survive A after B is dead, and B is a life in being at the creation of the interest.


500

covents of quiet enjoyment 

grantees interest in the property will not be disturbed by anyone holding a superior title 

500

Methods of termination

express termination, misuse, merger, abandonamnet, estoppel, condemnation, release

500

Elk Creek v. Gilbert

  • If the eviction would not have happened but for the tenants protected activity, tenant has a defense against the eviction (presumption of retaliation)
500

O→     to A and the heirs of his body, but if A divorces, O may reenter.

A:        Present interest in a fee tail subject to condition subsequent (because if A divorces, O has the option to retake the estate)

O:        Right of reentry (because a triggered condition, the divorce, would give O the option to re-take the estate)  and a reversion (following the natural termination of the fee tail) combined are called a reversion, in FSA

500

O→     to A and his heirs, but if the premises are not used for school purposes during the next 20 years, to B and his heirs.

A:        Present interest in a life estate

B:        Vested remainder in FS subject to divestment (subject to divestment because B could die before A – that is, before the interest would become possessory, thus losing it in favor of C)

C:        Shifting executory interest in FSA

O:        Nothing

RAP applies to C’s executory interest, but is the interest is valid for the same reason as in Problem #10.