psychology, aim, method
procedures, materials, participants
results, conclusions
generalizability, validity, reliability, strengths/weaknesses
issues and debates AND ethics
100

what was the research method?

The research method was a Laboratory Experiment 

100

List the materials used in the study (3 things)

recorded message

lined paper 

paper with shapes to shade

100

why was one of the participant's results removed from the study

they did not doodle

100

evaluate the generalizability of the study

it was low because people were recruited from a specific population already taking psychology classes

100

outline one application from this study to every day life

1. doodling may help students when reviewing for a test

2. doodling may help students when listening to a lecture or podcast

200

state the psychology being studied and define them

attenrtion- ability to concentrate

memory- retrieval of information

200

describe the participants in the study (2 things)

age range 18-55

more girls than guys in both of the groups

200

how was the performance monitoring score calculated

the number of false alarms (wrong names) was subtracted from the correct names

200

What makes this study's reliability good?

It's a standardized procedure which makes it easier to reproduce. Since things such as the recorded message and the pre drawn shapes can be recreated.

200

evaluate the ethical issues in this study

 there was deception but the Ps were debriefed so this was acceptable

300

state the aim of the study

to test if doodling aids conentration in a boring task

300

Explain the purpose of pulling participants from another study

they were already bored and ready to leave which would enhance the boredom of the Andrade task

300

explain the difference between results and conclusions

results are data

conclusions is what we learn from the data

300

explain why validity was reasonable (vs good or bad)

it effectively tested the aim (face validity)

it had low ecological validity 

300

outline the individual explanation arguement for this study (1 example is fine)

1. Ps may have used similar strategies before (doodling to help them concentrate...)

2. Ps personality or brain may require them to use something like doodling to keep them aroused (focused...)

400

what was the experimental design of the study?

independent measures

400

what type of sampling technique was used

opportunity sample

400

What was a conclusion of the Andrade study?

Participants who performed a shape-shading task concentrated better on a mock telephone message than those who listened with no concurrent task.

400

describe a weakness of the study

because it is a lab experiment it has low ecological validity- most people are not asked to listen to a monotone message and tested on remembering its contents

400

outline the nurture side of the debate in reference to this study

experience or exposure (like names and places they have heard before) could have helped them recall info better than others who did not have the same experiences

500

explain what independent measures means

it is when the person only takes part in one part of the IV 

500

give 3 steps of the procedures after the participants were recruited, assigned to a group, and placed in the room (do not include the materials they were given)

they were read a script

they listened to a boring message

they were given a memory test

500

Compare and contrast the results of correctly recalled information between the two groups.

The doodling group had a significantly higher amount of recalled correct information compared to the control group, with a mean of 7.5 pieces of info in the doodling group compared to the 5.8 pieces of info within the control group.

500

outline a strength of the study

lab experiments have high levels of control 

they are standardized 

500

outline the nature side of the debate in this study

there are biological differences in memory- some people may be better at recall than others