10 Codes
10-15
Transport Prisoner In Custody
11-11
Request Code 3 Back-up
A
Adam
242
Battery
"Stop And Frisk" on Reasonable Suspicion
Allows law enforcement officers to stop and briefly detain an individual if they have a reasonable suspicion that the person may be involved in criminal activity and could be armed. The officer can then conduct a limited pat-down search of the individual's outer clothing to ensure they are not carrying any weapons. This case has had a significant impact on law enforcement, as it clarified the boundaries of law enforcement officer's authority to conduct searches without a warrant or probable cause.
Terry vs. Ohio
10-9
Repeat
11-99
Officer Down/Mayday
T
Tom
459
Burglary
Before conducting custodial interrogations you must read the individual their rights. This decision aimed to safeguard individuals' Fifth Amendment rights and ensure that their statements are obtained fairly and voluntarily.
Miranda vs Arizona
10-33
Emergency Traffic/Clear The Air
11-24
Abandoned Vehicle
3056
Violation Of Parole
Introduced the "objective reasonableness" standard for evaluating the use of force by law enforcement. The Court emphasized that the use of force should be assessed from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene.
Graham vs Conner
Wanted - F, M, T, V
10-32
Frank-Felony
Mary-Misdemeanor
Tom-Traffic
Victor-Vehicle
Accident Major Injury
11-80
R
Robert
Felon In Possession Of A Firearm
29800(a)(1)
The "Fleeing Felon" Rule
The use of deadly force to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect is only justified when the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical harm to the officer or others. This ruling established a constitutional standard for the use of deadly force by law enforcement, commonly referred to as the "fleeing felon" rule.
Tennessee vs Garner
File/Report Number
10-60
Ambulance
11-41
U
Union
Damaging Any Communication Device To Prevent Call For Help
591.5
"Fruit Of The Poisonous Tree"
Evidence obtained through unreasonable searches and seizures, which is in violation of the Fourth Amendment, cannot be used in state criminal prosecutions. This principle is known as the "exclusionary rule" and aims to deter law enforcement from conducting unlawful searches by ensuring that any evidence that is obtained unlawfully would be inadmissible in court.
Mapp vs Ohio