If a person is treated for back pain in the lookback of a pre-existing claim with a California Situs, what do you need to know to determine if it is pre-existing?
Was it a diagnosed condition.
The pre-ex-investigation manages what for the company?
risk
Notice of the ongoing pre-x investigation.
Why it is important to document the pre-x review outcome in the action plan?
This is helpful for anyone reviewing the claim to know what pre-existing conditions were found.
In New York, it is not permitted to deny benefits for a pre-existing condition. What do New York plans do instead?
What is the first thing you need after the interview to start your pre-ex-investigation?
Medical authorization
anything reasonable, stroke, heart attack, fracture after mva
Can you refer a pre-existing review to clinical along with a request to assist with determining if restrictions and limitations are supported?
yes, with a detailed referral specifying both needs.
the exclusion of reasonable prudent person wording.
and the three-pronged provision is not permitted
Name three things that should be on the pre-existing review templet
any three:
pre-x info (doh, ied, dlw, ddc)
pre-x provision
disabling conditions
pharmacy profiles
calls to providers and medical requested
conditions confirmed pre-extisting
outcome of review
Do you continue the pre-ex-investigation if you have already approved the claim after ruling out the primary disabling condition is not pre-existing?
yes
We request medical records from all providers the claimant treated with in the lookback.
what other types of plan funding are there other than fully insured
Self-funded (administrative services agreement)
limited funding (when the funding arrangements for a claim change from fully insured to self-funded)
After all information is received, what steps are taken to complete your pre-ex-review?
review the medical records/pharmacy records
and if unclear request NC/PCS assistance
You would advise the claimant of the outcome of the investigation
any
If the plan is self-funded.
Why is a back injury not necessarily a good disabling condition to rule out a pre-existing condition from a specific accident or incident?