Claims & Evidence
Logical Fallacy
Counter Claims and Rebbutals
100

This is a debatable position that forms the foundation of your argument.

Claim

100

This fallacy attacks the person instead of their argument.

Ad Hominem

100

This represents an opposing viewpoint to the writer's argument.

Counter Claim

200

You need this to validate and support your claim in argumentative writing.

Evidence

200

"This is true because it's true" exemplifies this type of faulty reasoning.

Circular Reasoning

200

You use this to address and refute opposing arguments.

Rebuttal

300

This type of evidence is considered the strongest as it has been evaluated by experts.

Data, facts, peer-reviewed research

300

This fallacy involves misrepresenting an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack.

Straw Man

300

A strong rebuttal must include these two elements.

Logical reasoning and evidence

400

This process explains how your evidence connects to your claim.

Reasoning

400

This fallacy compares two things in a misleading way.

False Analogy

400

This shows up in a counterclaim when people are trying but failing to talk about their opps. 

Logical Fallacy 

500

This describes the proper way to integrate evidence into your writing.

Providing context and a clear explanation

500

This fallacy happens when people are drawing conclusions from insufficient evidence

Hasty Generalization

500

This common mistake weakens a rebuttal and should be avoided.

Personal Attacks