PF
Weighing
Topic
HARD
100

what is the Constructive speech

The speech where each side presents their main arguments.

100

What is Weighing?

To compare your arguments with your opponents and tell the judge why you win
100

The country where the U.S. launched missile strikes on December 25, 2025.


Nigeria

100

Why might the Pro say their impact has better timeframe?


Because stopping killings now is more urgent than long-term risks.


200

What is Crossfire?

This 3-minute speech allows both debaters to ask and answer questions.

200

What is Timeframe

This weighing mechanism asks which impact happens sooner.

200

 The extremist group targeted in the U.S. strikes.

ISIS

200

Why might the Con say their impact has greater scope?


Because military intervention could destabilize the entire region, not just one area.

300

What is the Final Focus?

The final speech of the debate, where no new arguments are allowed.

300

What is Magnitude?

This mechanism compares the sheer size or severity of an impact.

300

The Nigerian state where the strikes occurred.

Sokoto State

300

Why might the Pro argue high probability for this outcome.

 successfully degrading ISIS with precision strikes

400

what is a summary speech?

3 minute speech to summarize the main points for the judge and tell them why you win
400

What is Probability?

This mechanism compares how likely an impact is to occur.


400

One reason President Trump gave for authorizing the strikes

What is to protect Christians from being killed (or to stop ISIS violence against civilians)

400

How might Con argue high probability for this negative outcome


What is civilian casualties or increased terrorist recruitment?


500

When can we NOT bring up new arguments?

Grand crossfire and Final Focus

500

What is Scope?

This weighing mechanism asks which impact affects more people.


500

Who is ISIS?

ISIS is a violent extremist group. Its full name is the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.

500

Give a magnitude comparison from this topic.

Saving hundreds of civilian lives now outweighs the potential for future regional instability