Introduction
Material and Methods
Cases
Bias
Discussion/Conclusions
100

How often are canines impacted?

1-3 %

100

What were the two search terms used?

impacted and canine

100

Removing the odontome from FA's fixed her imoacted canine.


True or False

False

100

How many articles were in the paper

15

100

The review concluded that both of these are effective options for impacted canines.

Extractions & Orthodontic traction

200

What physical barriers can cause canines to be impacted

Supernumerary teeth, odontomas and cysts

200

How many patients were studied in this study. 

3

200

In DS's case after orthodntic treatment what happened to the position of her teeth.

Right canine further worsen its position. The left canine remained in its position.

200

What Bias model was used

ROBINS-I and RoB 2

200

This treatment option preserves the natural tooth and supports esthetics, but is more complex and time-consuming.

Orthodontic traction

300

What treatment modalities are compared in this article?

Early genetic screening, CBCT-guided surgical planning, and integrated orthodontic-surgical treatment techniques

300

What was the PICO model

Population: Human subjects with impacted canine;

Intervention: Orthodontic treatment for to disinclude canines to bring them into the arch or extract them;

Comparison: Control group;

Outcome: Evaluation of successful canine disinclusion;

300

What were the ages of the three participants 

12

8

9

300

How many articles had high risk of bias, medium risk and low risk

High: 8

Medium: 3

Low:4

300

This diagnostic imaging tool improved accuracy and surgical planning by providing 3D visualization

CBCT

400

Name at least one positive and one negative of extraction of a canine that is imoacted.

immediate resolution of the problem, reducing the risk of infection, cyst formation, and further dental damage, and potentially shortening the overall treatment time


extraction can lead to aesthetic concerns and functional issues, necessitating prosthetic replacements to maintain the appearance and occlusal function

400

What were the exclusion criteria for the participants

open bite, deep bite and oral/systemic diseases 

400

Which teeth was the patient in case 3 misisng

mandibular second premplars and two incisors. 

400

Name the Domains of Bias in RoB 2

from randomization process, deviations from intended intervention, missing outcome data, measurement of the outcome and selection of reported result. 

400

What advanced surgury techniques has improved outcomes by reducing surgical time and enhancing the speed of tooth eruption, with minimal side effects

lasers and corticotomy

500

What is one postive and one negative of traci=tion

reetaining a natural and appealing smile, and ensuring proper occlusion, is complex, time-consuming, and requires meticulous orthodontic management and patient compliance

risks such as infection and potential damage to surrounding structures


500

What exclusion criteria wese used for the systemic reviews

 v\Exclusion criteria included non-English-language articles, ineligible research designs, ineligible outcome measures, ineligible populations, case studies, reviews, and animal studies.

500

What are some similairites between the three cases besides the inclusion criteria.

The canines did not improve in any of the cases with orthodontics alone

All patient's were female. 

500

Which Domain of bias was most common. 

Bias arising from randomization process. 

500

What future diagnostic tool may help predict impaction risk and guide early intervention.

Early genetic screening