Offer, invitation or information?
Acceptance rules
Contract cases
Serious offer or puff?
100

A clear and definite promise showing willingness to be legally bound if the other party accepts. 

What is an offer?

100

What is acceptance?

Final and unqualified agreement to the terms of an offer.

100

What did Mrs Carlill have to do to accept the company’s offer?

Use the smoke ball as directed and still contract influenza.

100

What is an advertising puff?

An exaggerated promotional claim that a reasonable person would not interpret as a serious contractual promise.

200

A laptop is displayed in a shop with a $900 price tag. Is the display an offer or an invitation to treat?

Invitation to treat. The customer makes the offer when they attempt to purchase the laptop.

200

Can silence generally constitute acceptance?

No. An offeror generally cannot state that silence will be treated as acceptance.

200

What fact in Carlill demonstrated that the company was serious about paying the reward?

The company stated that it had deposited £1,000 in a bank.

200

A restaurant advertises that it serves “the greatest burgers in the universe.” Is this likely an offer or a puff?

A puff. It is exaggerated, subjective and not sufficiently definite.

300

In Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots, when was the offer made?

The customer made the offer when presenting the goods at the checkout. The store could then accept or reject it.

300

Mia offers to sell a bicycle for $300. Noah replies, “I’ll pay $250.” What has Noah made?

A counter-offer, not an acceptance. The original $300 offer is generally rejected.

300

Why did the court find that Pepsi’s Harrier jet advertisement was not a contractual offer?

No reasonable person would regard it as a serious and genuine promise. It was humorous and exaggerated.

300

A person posts: “$500 reward to anyone who returns my missing dog. Call the number below.” What type of offer could this be?

A unilateral offer that can be accepted by performing the specified act—returning the dog.

400

In Harvey v Facey, why was the statement of the lowest price not an offer?

It merely supplied information about the price and did not show a definite willingness to sell.

400

Under the postal acceptance rule, when does acceptance generally become effective?

When the correctly addressed acceptance is posted, provided that using the post was contemplated or reasonable and the rule has not been excluded.

400

Give two reasons why the advertisement in Carlill was enforceable while the Pepsi advertisement was not.

Possible answers include:

  • Carlill contained a clear and definite reward.
  • The £1,000 bank deposit demonstrated seriousness.
  • Acceptance could occur through completing specified conditions.
  • The Pepsi jet was an exaggerated joke.
  • The jet was absent from the official catalogue.
  • A reasonable person would not believe Pepsi intended to provide a military aircraft.
400

An advertisement states, “Huge cash reward available to anyone who is disappointed with our product.” What contractual problem does this create?

The promise may lack certainty because “huge,” “disappointed” and the conditions for receiving the reward are unclear.