What the Logic
merely rejecting the conclusion
Meaning in
The only things that are in our control, according to Epictetus
only opinion, pursuit, desire, aversion--in other words, action
Who would say that the loss of a romantic partner is indifferent (neither good nor bad)
Epictetus
A strategy of critique that relies on a description of a concrete scenario
Counter-example
Gbadagesin's definition of moral responsibility
appropriate blame/praise and punishment/reward
Epictetus's theory of the source of harm, anxiety, worry, or care
only the self, or self-caused
The aspect of Frankfurt's view of love that Wonderly critiques
selflessness or disinterest
The two ways to object to an argument
critique a premise or its logic (the connection between conclusion and premise)
The problem, for which Gbadegesin's resolution is to appeal to weak destiny
An apparent tension between unchosen destiny and moral responsibility
something that is good, but not for its own sake
instrumental good, or good as a means
A kind of self-interest that is relevant to love, on Wonderly's view
meaning, or identity-shaping interests
An approach(s) to meaning that allows for the possibility of being wrong about what is meaningful
Hybrid and objective approaches
Aspects of a person that an ori determines
character, or tastes and preferences
The condition that makes wealth, power, and respect a value, on Aristotle's view
wisdom/virtue
The requirements for love, on Frankfurt's view
non-instrumental, non-egoistic, and selfless
An approach(s) to meaning that makes one an infallible judge of meaninglessness
Subjective and hybrid approaches
A factor that Gbadagesin claims enables alteration of destiny even within a strong destiny framework
Divine edict
play your assigned role/character as naturally as possible
Wonderly's reason why material interests, sexual, culinary, etc. do not play any role in love
raises the problem of substitutability