historian
Writing Like a Historian
DAy 3
day 4
day
100

why it’s important to think like a historian

• To have the ability to better determine the accuracy and/or validity of information (claims made to them)

• In order to be less prone to bias and/or influence from others

• Enhance their critical thinking skills and abilities

• To better discern misinformation, falsehoods, rumor(s), from fact

100

what is a Rebuttal paragraph:

An explanation of the strongest reason against your argument; a primary source of evidence that supports this opposing point of view; a counter to this evidence/perspective

100

what is the second rule to write like a historian…

second rule is to follow-up your  introduction paragraph with a contextualization paragraph

100

Read the paragraph below and then circle if the source(s) described in the paragraph are a primary source or a secondary source:

While researching the Boston Tea Party, Liam used his history textbook along with a book on the American Revolution that he borrowed from his school’s library to help him complete his project. Did Liam use a primary source or a secondary source?


PRIMARY SECONDARY

SECONDARY

100

Describe a Introduction paragraph

Circumstances of the event; the who, what, where, when, why, & how; the historical question you’re trying to answer and why it’s important; a description of how you’ll answer the historical question

200

what is a primary source

A primary source is a source that participated in or witnessed an event,

200

How do you do a MLA format for a website 

Author’s last name, author’s first name. Article Title. 

Website title. Publisher or website name, date accessed.

<URL> (if source is difficult to find)

200

what is the The fifth rule to write like a historian 

The fifth rule is to follow-up your  rebuttal paragraph with a conclusion paragraph

200

A rebuttal paragraph should include:

  • An explanation of the strongest reason against your argument

300

Name at least one way we can use evidence to help us think like a historian:

• To consider if the evidence being presented is from a primary source or a secondary source

• Does someone who is making a claim about something provide evidence that supportstheir claim?

• Might the person making a claim about something have intentionally left out evidence – evidence that may not support their claim or contradict what they’re claiming

300

What Critical Thinking

“The objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgement”

300

what is the third rule to write like a historian…

The third rule is to follow-up your  contextualization paragraph with a corroboration paragraph

300


What is a secondary source 




a secondary source did not participate in or witness a particular event. A secondary source uses the accounts of primary sources to describe something

400

what is CONTEXTUALIZATION

To contextualize something is to give proper consideration of the circumstances surrounding an event

400

why should we Question Everything

By asking questions, we’re better able to get to the ROOT CAUSE of something.

To help us do this, consider Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How

400

A corroboration paragraph should include:

  • At least one primary source that provides credible evidence which can help convince readers of your point of view

400

Why do we care about history?


To better understand what’s happened in the past



400

Is this MLA or APA

Tolstoy, Leo. War and Peace.

Moscow: Mosfilm Publishing Company, 1968.

MILA

500

What is CORROBORATION

To corroborate something is when evidence is used to support and/or confirm the validity/credibility of information (a claim) presented to us

500

what is the first rule to write like a historian…

the first rule is to write an introduction paragraph

500

what is the The fourth rule to write like a historian 

The fourth rule is to follow-up your  corroboration paragraph with a rebuttal paragraph

500

Read the paragraph below and then circle if the source(s) described in the paragraph are a primary source or a secondary source:

During her research on World War II, Jessica spoke with a World War II veteran who described his experiences and memories of the War to her. Did Jessica use a primary source or a secondary source?

PRIMARY SECONDARY

PRIMARY

500

Is this MILA or APA 

Tolstoy, L. (1968)

War and Peace. Moscow: Mosfilm Publishing Company

APA