Racial Gerrymandering
Eminent Domain
Religion
Free Speech vs. National Security
100

What case explorers the constitutionality of racial gerrymandering?

Shaw v. Reno

100

What case explores the rights of eminent domain?

Kelo v. New London

100

What case explores the laws around school prayer?

Engel v. Vitale

100

Which case weighs the value of free speech and national security?

New York Times co. v. United States

200

Which state drew clearly racially gerrymandered districts

North Carolina

200

What city authorized eminent domain to create a headquarters for Pfizer

New London

200

Which case weighs freedom of religion with the value of education?

Wisconsin v. Yoder

200

The pentagon papers were leaked, revealing key national security details concerning this war

Vietnam

300

This political party's judges were in favor of upholding racial gerrymandering

Liberal

300

Kelo argued that the use of this did not constitute public use

Eminent domain

300

In the case Wisconsin v. Yoder, the court ruled this as the winner

Yoder

300

The US Justice Department sued the NYT to stop publishing, saying it would create this. 

A national security threat

400

Shaw v. Reno ruled this side as the winner. 

Shaw

400

New London claimed the use of eminent domain would bring this to the city. 

Economic stimulation

400

The court favored decided in favor for this side. 

Enge

400

What were the pentagon papers used to do?

Study American tactics in Vietnam

500

A US Attorney claimed that her state should have at least how many majority black districts, leading to Shaw v. Reno

Two

500

The case Kelo v. New London ruled in favor for this.

New London

500

What did dissenters argue in Engel v. Vitale

Dissenters argued that a voluntary, nondenominational prayer was not supporting any religion.

500

The court ruled for this side in New York Times v. United States case

The New York Times