Ethical Guidelines
Formulating Research
Methodology I
Methodology II
Evaluating Research
100

A participant must decide to participate in an experiment of their own free will.

Voluntary Participation

100

A condition that the experimenter systemically manipulates, changes, or varies in order to determine its effect on another variable

Independent Variable

100

The larger group of research interest from which a sample is drawn.

Population

100

A smaller group of participants selected from, and representative of, the characteristics of the larger population of research interest.

Sample

100

The extent to which an assessment tool produces consistent results.

Reliability

200

Clarifying each participant’s understanding of the nature of the study after deception has been used

Debriefing

200

Any variable other than the IV that can cause a change in the DV

Extraneous Variable

200

A sample in which every member of the target population has an equal chance of being selected.

Random Sampling
200

A group of participants within an experiment that should be similar in characteristics to the experimental group, but haven’t received the independent variable.  

Control Group

200

Whether or not the measure is stable over time or between people

External Reliability

300

Researchers must ensure that those taking part in research will not be caused distress.

Protection from Harm

300

It is a clear and concise statement of what the researcher is trying to find out 

Aim

300

It doesn't involve the manipulation of variables, and is often used in research where it is unethical or not possible to manipulate variables.

Non-experimental Research

300

Breaking a population into groups based on shared characteristics and a random sample is then selected from each stratum

Stratified Sampling

300

Whether the effects observed in a study are due to the manipulation of the independent variable and not some other factor.

Internal Validity

400
Identify one of the 3 Rs in Animal Research

Replace or Reduce or Refine

400

The ways in which each participant varies from the other, and how this could affect the results e.g. mood, intelligence

Participant Variable

400

The sampling technique most likely to result in a sample that is representative of the target population, meaning results can be generalised.

Strength of Random Sampling

400

Limitation of Case Studies

  • Results cannot be generalised to the entire population

  • Hard to replicate

400

The extent to which results or findings obtained from a sample are applicable to a broader population

Generalisaibility

500

An ethical consideration that Walter Freeman violated

Informed Consent OR Withdrawal Rights OR Protection from Harm OR Confidentiality

500

Predicts that the independent variable will have an effect on the dependent variable, but the direction of the effect is not specified

Non-directional Hypothesis

500

Strength of Non-experimental Research

  • Is often cheaper and easier to run than experimental research

  • Allows the researcher to investigate naturally occurring variables that maybe unethical or impractical to test experimentally

500

Strength of Case Studies

Information derived provides a considerable in-depth study allowing a full description of the person’s behaviour.

500

One thing needed for generalisability

  •  The sample needs to be representative of the population

  •  Extraneous and potential confounding variables must be controlled

  •  Measures must be reliable and valid