Participants
Procedure
Ethic, Strength, Weakness
Findings
Miscellaneous
100

What was the name of the university where the study took place?

Kyoto University in Japan

100

What were the 2 conditions of this study?

Can See condition

Cannot See condition

100

What type of research design was used?

Repeated measures design

100
Which chimp was the only one to look through the hole in the cannot see trial
Ayumu
100

What was the sampling technique?

Opportunity

200

How many Chimps were used?


5 chimps


200
Two ways in which a trial would end:

When the recipient received the object and succeeded in obtaining the juice reward

After 5 minutes had elapsed without an object being passed

200

Because lab experiments are so regulated and highly controlled, it has high ________

Reliability

200

Object offer was categorized in two ways:

Upon request (asked for tool)

Voluntary (given tool without asking)

200

How many trials were used for each phase?

48 trials for each phase

300

What had the participants previously been trained to do?

Taught to solve the problem present to them (getting the juice) but no other training or shaping had been conducted

300

What are 2 details about the booths?

Structure was 200 cm tall

Hole was 1 meter off the floor

Opaque or transparent wall depending on the conditions

300

What is a weakness of the experiment?

- Lacks mundane realism as chimps belong in the wild

- Low ecological validity b/c it was done in a lab

(There are other possible weaknesses)

300

What were the percentage results of objects offered for the 3 phases?

can see 1 - 91%

cannot see - 96%

can see 2 - 98%


300

Identify a psychology being investigated

- Theory of Mind

- Altruism

- Targeted helping

400

What was the name of the chimp that did not partake in the study?

Chloe, the mother of Cleo

400

Explain why the Can See condition was done twice

To test whether the experimental order was having an effect on object choice

400

Explain why the study has low generalizability

no, only used five chimps and chimps bred in captivity so findings are harder to generalize to wild chimp behavior in helping others



400

What did previous studies find in regards to animals and altruism? 

Primates showed altruistic food sharing.

400

How can the study be applied to everyday life?

- It can be applicable to children in terms of development and education about helping others. 

- Also could help us recognize the need/signs for help in those who are nonverbal

500

Name the 5 participants

Cleo, Ai, Ayumu, Pan, Pal












500

Name the 7 objects offered to the chimps

hose, brush, rope, chain, belt, stick, straw

500

Explain 3 animal ethical guidelines that were respected in this study.

- # of animals: They were kept at a minimum needed to produce valid and reliable results

- No pain/distress: None were harmed physically or psychologically

- Housing: In social housing when not in booths

- Reward, deprivation...: Did not deprive them of food/drink, "rewarded" with juice box

500

What were the 2 conclusions

Chimps will help upon request, not spontaneously.

Chimps will help if they can see what the problem is.




500

what were the IV and DV and data type?

iv- can see and cannot see conditions

dv- proportion of trials where the stick or straw was given or not given

data- quantitative: as above