Study Basics
Participants/Sample
Methods/Procedure
Findings/Results
Explanation, Issues, Debates
100

This common activity is defined in the study as the sketching of patterns and figures unrelated to the primary task.

Doodling

100

Participants were recruited from this UK council’s unit for cognitive research.

What is the Medical Research Council?

100

The mock telephone message was recorded in this type of voice.

Monotonous 

100

This is the percentage more that doodlers recalled compared to the mean of the control group.

29%

100

This is the mental activity that doodling reduces to help concentration on the primary task.

Daydreaming

200

What are the two components of the working memory model that this study focuses on?

Phonological loop and visuospatial sketchpad

200

There were this many participants in the doodling condition and the same number in the control condition.

20

200

Participants in the doodling condition were asked to do this to the squares and circles on the sheet.

Shade

200

This was the mean number of shapes shaded by participants in the doodling condition.

What is 36.3?

200

One explanation is that doodling raises this to reduce daydreaming and improve focus.

Arousal

300

This was the boring primary task all participants had to perform while either doodling or not.

listening to a (mock telephone) message?

300

Participants were in this age range.

18-55

300

The order of recalling names and places was controlled using this technique.

Counterbalancing

300

Doodlers performed better on both monitored information (names) and this type of information (places).

Incidental info

300

What was included in the results (aside from correct and memory scores?

False alarms

400

These are the two possible explanations offered for why memory improved in the doodling condition.

What are deeper processing or better attention?

400

No participant in this condition doodled spontaneously.

control condition / control group?

400

This is another name for the doodling task

Concurrent task

400

For monitored names, the doodling group’s memory score was this compared to control’s.

5.1 vs 4.0

400

Without a measure of this, it was difficult to distinguish between the two explanations.

Daydreaming (again...)

500

What does this study say in regards to the working memory model?

The phonological loops and visuospatial sketchpad do not compete for cognitive resources
500

This many doodlers and this many controls suspected there would be a memory test

3 doodlers and 4 control participants

500

Three ways in which Andrade controlled the experiment

Groups, instructions, study beforehand, lab experiment

500

For incidental places, the doodling group’s memory score was this compared to control’s.

2.4 vs 1.8


500

It would have been useful to collect this type of data about whether participants daydreamed.

Qualitative data