Procedure
Sample
Strengths & Weaknesses
Results
Random
100

What was the Independent Variable?

Whether they doodled or didn't

100

How many people where there in the sample?

40

100

How was extraneous variables limited?

Lab Experiment

100

Did the doodling group perform better when recalling names? (Yes or no)

Yes

100

What was the research design?

Independent measures design

200

What were they told they would be tested on or asked to recall?

Partygoers or names of Places

200

What where they members of?

Medical Research Council of the Applied Psychology Unit

200

How was the procedure standardized?

They made all participants equally likely to be bored and therefore daydream. For example, the same monotonous recording was used and all participants were sat in a dull quiet room.

200

Did the non-doodling group do better when recalling name of places? (Yes or no)

No

200

What was the dependent variable?

How many names the participant recalled.

300

What did they listen to?

A phone call

300

What type of sampling technique was used?

Opportunity sampling

300

Explain how the study was generalized or explain how it wasn't generalized.

Participants' age ranged from 18-55 years thus, were representative. However, they are from a recruitment panel and may be very similar.

300

State the conclusion of the study.

Doodling helps concentration on a primary task as doodling participants performed better than participants who only listened to the primary task.

300

What counted as false alarms?

Totally wrong names

400

Where were they in when listening to the audio?

A dull quiet room

400

Where they paid a sum to do the study? (Yes or no)

Yes!

400

How was the quantitative and qualitative data objective?

The number of names and places. This is an objective record of memory. It would have had been helpful to ask participants for self-reports of any daydreaming to understand whether differences in results were due to attention or daydreaming.

400

What was the mean of names the non-doodling group recalled?

5.8

400

How was the final score measured? 

The final score was the number of correct names minus the number of false alarms.

500
How long was the audio message?

2.5 minutes

500

How many men where in the doodling group originally?

3 males

500

Explain how the study could have been unethical.

Participants did not give informed consent fully for the recall task. This may have caused psychological distress.

500

What was the mean of the names the doodling group recalled?

7.8

500

What was the animal mentioned in the phone call?

Cat