500
*Triple Jeopardy* Three part answer. First, this was Congress’s purchase of thirty thousand square miles of land in what is now present-day Arizona and New Mexico. The primary goal of the purchase was for use in the construction of the Southern Pacific Railroad’s transcontinental railroad route. Second, this was the pro-slavery constitution of Kansas that was drafted after border ruffians fraudulently elected a pro-southern constitutional convention in Kansas. Pro-Southern President James Buchanan wanted this to be accepted and Kansas to enter the USA as a slave state. Stephen Douglas, furious the popular sovereignty had resulted in violence and a fraudulent election in Kansas, opposed this, leading to his split with the President and the southern-dominated Democratic party. After the outbreak of the Civil War, Kansas eventually entered the Union in 1861 as a free state. Third, and finally, this was the court case introduced when a slave traveled with his master to a free state and subsequently claimed that his residency on free soil entitled him to his freedom. The court decided that since people with African ancestry could not be citizens, they could not sue, making the entire case irrelevant. Still, the court went even further by claiming that this slave was a piece of property, and therefore he belonging to his owner and could not be taken by the government without due process (as stated in the Constitution.) This was a massively significant case as it suggested that slavery could exist anywhere in the USA.
What is the Gadsden Purchase, the Lecompton Constitution, and Dred Scott vs. Sanford?