"Kinds" of Knowledge and Philosopher's Stances
"Knowledge" Logical reasoning and empirical evidence. One philisopher claimed it is never total and abstract.
Episteme
Being seen as a relatable and trustworthy person
Social Authenticity
This type of social capital is characterized by strong ties and mutual support
Bonding Social Capital
"Real-World" Knowledge, having the knowledge of cultural, institutional, technical, and contextual of the world.
Doxa
“Book smarts” or being knowledgeable on a certain topic
Ethos
This type of social capital is the relationships and connections that link people from different social groups, communities, or backgrounds
Bridging Social Capital
"Practical Wisdom" A combination of real-world knowledge and good judgement
Phronesis
Use of logical reasoning and evidence in arguments
Logos
"Clock Time" Appointments and Schedules
Chronos
Which philosopher defined rhetoric through logical, emotional, and ethical appeals.
Aristotle
The appeal to emotions
"Time is Right" "Now or Never" Time can be fluid and dynamic
Kairos
WILDCARD: How do the kind of knowledge connect to social capital?
Doxa, phronesis, and episteme collectively enhance social capital by fostering shared beliefs and trust within a community (doxa), enabling practical wisdom and ethical decision-making in interactions (phronesis), and facilitating the sharing of knowledge across diverse groups (episteme).
WILDCARD: What is the difference between credibility and social authority?
Credibility means being trusted and reliable because of your knowledge and experience. Social authority is the power or influence someone has in a community based on their position or status.
WILDCARD: How does social capital connect to social authenticity and credibility?
Social capital is enhanced by social authenticity, as genuine interactions build trust and deeper connections within a community. Credibility relies on the trust established through social capital, allowing individuals to effectively influence and mobilize others in their networks.