Ethical Foundations
Reliability and Validity
Research Designs and Causality
Sampling techniques
100

This principle emphasizes showing respect for individuals as autonomous agents. 

Respect for persons

100

When a test consistently produces the same results across time, it demonstrates this. 

Reliability
100

Assigning participants to groups by chance is called this

Randomization

100

Every member of the population has an equal chance of selection.

Simple random sampling

200

This federal report (1979) established the ethical principles of respect, beneficence, and justice. 

Belmont report

200

The degree to which a test actually measures what it claims to measure.

Validity

200

In this design, participants are not randomly assigned to groups but groups are still compared. 

Quasi-experimental design

200

In this technique, the population is divided into subgroups and random samples are taken from each

Stratified random sampling

300

Research proposals at universities must be reviewed by this entity. 

Institutional Review Board (IRB)

300

A measure that correlates strongly with similar constructs but not with unrelated measures shows this. 

Convergent and discriminant validity

300

In this design, participants are randomized to different experimental conditions to eliminate other explanations.

Randomized control trial (RCT)

300

When naturally occurring groups are randomly chosen and all individuals in those groups are studied

Cluster sampling

400

Deception in research is not fully prohibited, but requires researchers to do this afterward.

Debrief particpants

400

A study that is in this type of validity can be generalized to other populations or settings

External validity

400

A design in which different participants are assigned to different conditions, with each participant experiencing only one condition. 

Between subjects design

400
This non-probability sampling method involves recruiting whoever is easiest to access.

Convenience sampling

500

According to APA guidelines, investigators must ensure participants understand they can do this at any time. 

Withdraw from the study

500

This type of reliability is concerned with consistencies across observers.

Interrater reliability

500

These three things are needed to establish causality 

1. Covariation
2. Temporal precedence
3. Elimination of alternative explanations

500

A research is interested in a hard-to-reach population, like individuals with a rare disease, might rely on this referral-based technique.

Snowball sampling