Defintions
Snyder & Swan
Real World
Caverni & Peris
100

Bias

Normal human tendencies to think in certain ways, often contrary to, or without considering evidence

100

What was the aim of Snyder & Swann’s study?

See how people try and support their ideas when gathering data

100

Student writing with pencil on test did well, pencil was reason for success  

Illusory correlation

100

What is the Aim?

To investigate the influence of anchoring on thinking and decision making 

200

Confirmation bias

People select or interpret information to confirm/support preexisting beliefs, includes tendency to interpret ambiguous information to confirm their belief  

200

Was this study considered ethical due to misleading nature?

Yes, it is ethical

200

you know someone suffering from heart conditions in mid 50s, so you think most people in 50s have heart conditions

Availability

200

If a student had a high grade, what is expected score of essay?

The score will be higher than students with lower grades

300

Halo effect

False correlation of positive characteristics, Assumption that someone who has a few positive characteristics has many

300
What was the procedure?

Provided information about person, had to ask questions to determine if extrovert or introvert

300

People that are attractive have other positive characteristics

Halo effect

300

What was the Anchor?

The students grades

400

Conclusion people reach when they decide that events starting at same time are related, Sometimes stating they caused each other  

Illusory correlation

400

how did the information provided about participants affect questions?

Participants sought information that supported their idea

400

Someone acts quiet, reserved, shy so they are intelligent

Implicit Personality theory

400

What did Caverni & Peris find in their study on anchoring?

Higher the mean of fictional grades, the higher grade given by the teachers for the essays they graded, Fictional grades were the teachers anchor points

500

Relate to peoples understanding about which personality characteristics they think co-occur in others

Implicit Personality theory

500

What did Caverni & Peris find in their study on anchoring?

Higher the mean of fictional grades, the higher grade given by the teachers for the essays they graded, Fictional grades were the teachers anchor points

500

John is logical, unemotional, and interested in patterns, Most think he is math professor

Representativeness

500
What could be an implication?

Given anchor point or adjustment, people change behavior and/or expectations of others 

people’s judgement can easily be influenced by anchors and not always on purpose 

If unbiased opinion wanted, to receive no/less information beforehand to prevent schemas from forming