Elements
Negligence
Intentional Torts
Wild Card
Cases
100

Elements of Res Ipsa Loquitor

What is Res Ipsa Loquitor

100

The necessary things needed to prove causation.

What are Causation in fact (but for) and proximate cause

100
True or False; words may by themselves create an assault.

False; words alone do not justify assault

100

The three types of liabilities and an example of each.

What are Vicarious (employer), Strict (animals), and Products (warranty)

100

This case established that a child can be found to have intent through substantial certainty. It involved a child who pulled the chair out from under an adult before they sat down.

What is Garrett v Dailey

200

Elements of IIED

What is IIED

200

A duty is present if the burden of preventing injury is less than the probability of injury multiplied by the damages.

What is the Learned Hand Formula

200

Difference between Trespass to Chattel and Conversion

Trespass to Chattel: a minor interference. partially liable for object

Conversion: a major exercise of dominion. Fully liable for object

200
The exceptions to statutes of limitations

what are continuing torts, discovery rule, and fraudulent concealment

200

This case established the Learned Hand formula used to determine when someone had a duty. This case involved a boat that tried a risky maneuver at a dock and ended up causing damage to multiple other boats.

What is US v Carroll Towing Co.
300

Elements of Public Necessity

What is Public Necessity

300

The type of contributory negligence statute that Texas applies

What is Comparative Negligence (50%)

300

the type of intent required by battery

what is single intent

300

This case established that a physician must disclose any and all personal interests related to the patient's treatment that could influence their judgment before treatment begins. This case involved a doctor who treated a patient for Leukemia and used his spleen for a research patent that the patient was not aware of.

What is Moore v Regents of the University of California

300

This case established that the use of deadly force can only be used when there is a present and current threat to personal safety. It involved a shotgun trap rigged to go off if someone entered an abandoned house.

What is Katko v Briney

400

Elements of Private Necessity

What is Private Necessity

400

once a Plaintiff has fully recovered, they cannot recover anything further from any other defendant regardless of liability.

What is the Full/One Satisfaction Rule
400

True or False; a store employee preventing someone who they believe to be stealing is False Imprisonment

False, no it not lol

400
True or False: An injured party who received workers compensation from their employers can no longer sue that employer for any reason related to that injury.
False; an injured party can still sue their employer if the employer acted intentionally or with gross negligence.
400

This case established that punitive damages should not exceed a 4:1 ratio. This case involved a two lane highway were a car swerved to avoid a car and ended up hitting a different car.

What is State Farm v Campbell

500

Elements of Appropriation of Name or Likeness

What is Appropriation of Name or Likeness

500

Countdown to when a negligence cause becomes invalid to be brought starts when defendant acts.

What is Statute of Repose
500

the majority and minority arguments for defense of others

What is Majority: reasonable perception

Minority: step into shoes of victim (what were their rights?) 

500

The commute to work is not considered to be in the scope of employment.

What is the Going and Coming Rule

500

This case established that two independent tortfeasors may be jointly liable if it's impossible to tell which one caused Plaintiff's injuries. It involved a trio that went hunting, two shot at the same time, and the other got hit by one of the bullets.

What is Summers v Tice