Aim
Procedure
Evaluation
Results
100

How many participants were there?

274

100

How was interviewer effects avoided?

questionnaires was given in the native language

100

Why were flashbulb memories formed across all cultures

There was a national importance

200

How many countries were there? Extra 100 points per country

5; China, Germany, Turkey, United States, United Kingdom

200
How was the credibility increased?

The questionnaires were back-translated

200

Where did personal importance and intensity of emotion play less of a role?

China

300

What was the aim of the study?

To see if there was any difference in the rate of flashbulb memories in collectivistic and individualistic cultures

300

Were the questions similar to the previous study? And how many extra questions were asked?

Yes, 4 extra questions

300

Why can cultural factors affect the self-reported information?

There's no way to prove that the memories actually existed

400

What class were the participants?

Middle class