Background Information
Hypothesis
Methods
Results
SCD Lab Questions
100

What does IH stand for?

(Intellectual Humility — the tendency to lack overconfidence, acknowledge limitations of one's knowledge, and recognize others may have more expertise)

100

Did researchers expect children to prefer the IH or IA individual?

IH

100

How many children participated in Study 1?

111

100

At what age did the preference for IH first emerge?

5.49 years in Study 1 / 5.5 in Study 2

100

What is the password to the lab computers?

L1b3rmanL@b24

200

From as early as what age do children prefer confident individuals over hesitant ones?

Age 2

200

What did researchers expect would happen to the preference for IH as children got older?

It was expected to strengthen with age

200

Name the four ratings children were asked about after each trial

Who they liked more, who was smarter, who was nicer, who they would rather learn from

200

Which age group(range) was most consistent in choosing IH across all four ratings and trials?

8 to 11 year olds

200

What platform do we use to contact participants for new studies?

RedCap

300

What does research say children interpret confidence as a signal of?

Trustworthiness and credibility

300

What age group was NOT expected to show a strong or consistent preference either way?

4 and 5 year olds

300

What was the key difference in how the IH and IA adults responded?

The IH adult said "pretty sure" and was open to being wrong; the IA adult said "definitely sure" and said it could not be anything else

300

Did the child's gender or the adult's gender affect the results?

No — boys and girls responded the same way regardless of the adult's gender

300

Which graduate student studies accent?

Zoe C!

400

What two cognitive developments between ages 4–11 may explain a growing appreciation for IH?

Theory of mind and metacognition

400

Children were expected to prefer IH in both studies — what was different about the two studies that made this prediction meaningful?

Study 1 used knowledge children might possess; Study 2 used knowledge children could not possibly have

400

Why did researchers keep both adults equally warm and friendly?

So that only their level of certainty differed

400

What happened to the preference for IH when accuracy was completely removed in Study 2?

Children 5.5 and older still preferred the IH individual — humility alone was enough to drive the preference

400

How many windows are in the lab?

3 (drawn)

500

What were the two open questions left by prior research that this study aimed to address?

The exact age of onset and whether the preference was truly about humility or just accuracy

500

If Study 2 had shown children NO longer preferred the humble adult when accuracy was removed, what would that have told us about children's preference in Study 1?

It would have meant children weren't valuing humility as a trait — they were just tracking who was more likely to be correct

500

What was the one key change between Study 1 and Study 2 and why was that change necessary?

Ambiguous objects and words were replaced with nonsensical ones — to rule out accuracy as an alternative explanation

500

The preference for IH was slightly weaker in Study 2 than Study 1 — what does that suggest?

Accuracy adds to how much children favor the humble person, but humility alone is still enough to drive the preference

500

Name the most acronyms for lab studies!

Options: CAP, OLF, NBS, CIA, FEPPY, BS, IH, CRN, FNP, PBC