Types of Bias
Study Examples
Prevent the Problem
Confounding
Toward or Away
100

What is selection bias?

A distortion in the measure of association due to procedures used to select participants that are not representative of the target population.

100

What is the potential source of bias: Participants in a diet study self-report how many calories they consume.

Information bias, specifically recall or reporting bias.

100

How can you reduce recall bias?

Use objective records when possible, or shorten the recall period.

100

What is a confounder?

A variable that is associated with both the exposure and the outcome, and is not in the causal pathway.

100

What is bias toward the null?

A bias that weakens the observed association, making it appear closer to no effect.

200

What is recall bias?

A systematic error due to differences in accuracy or completeness of recollections retrieved by study participants about past events or exposures.

200

Case-control bias scenario: Smokers are more likely to remember exposures than non-smokers. What bias is present?

Recall bias.

200

How can you mask interviewers?

Use double-blind procedures or standardize interview scripts and training.

200

What are the three criteria for a confounder?

1) Associated with exposure, 2) Associated with outcome, 3) Not an intermediate step in the causal pathway.

200

What is bias away from the null?

A bias that exaggerates the observed association, making it appear stronger than it truly is.

300

What is interviewer bias?

A bias that occurs when interviewers subconsciously or consciously influence the responses of participants.

300

Cohort study with exposure error: Workers are classified as exposed based on job title, but some don't actually handle chemicals.

Misclassification bias (non-differential if equal across groups).

300

How to minimize misclassification?

Use validated measurement tools, training, and consistent definitions.

300

How do positive and negative confounding affect the observed association between exposure and outcome?

Positive confounding exaggerates the true association; negative confounding underestimates it.

300

What is the impact of poor recall?

Can cause recall bias, often leading to misclassification and bias in either direction.

400

What is information bias?

Systematic error due to inaccurate measurement or classification of study variables.

400

Who was misclassified? A survey uses outdated diagnostic criteria to determine disease status.

The cases were misclassified due to outdated disease definitions (information bias).

400

Matching vs. Restriction? What are they used for?

Both are strategies to control confounding at the design stage. Matching pairs exposed and unexposed on confounders; restriction limits study population by confounder status.

400

What is confounding by indication?

When the reason a patient receives treatment (the indication) is also a risk factor for the outcome. Common in observational studies.

400

In what direction can misclassification bias the observed association?

It can bias the association toward or away from the null, depending on whether the misclassification is non-differential (usually toward the null) or differential (can be in either direction).

500

What is misclassification?

Systematic error due to inaccurate measurement or classification of study variables.

500

Confounding or bias? Older people in a study are more likely to take vitamins and also more likely to develop heart disease.

Confounding by age.

500

One way to reduce confounding?

Design stage: Randomization, restriction, and matching 

Analysis stage: Stratification, multivariable analysis, and standardization 

500

How can you control for confounding at the analysis phase?

Stratification, multivariable adjustment, or propensity score matching.

500

What is the direction of confounding?

It depends on the relationship between the confounder, exposure, and outcome; can bias toward or away from the null.