Argument Foundations
Building & Evaluating Cases
Debate Structure
Responding & Refuting
Credibility, Style, & Fallacies
100

This term describes viewing an argument as something produced, like a cliam or position being presented.

What is an argument as product?

100

This is the 7-piece structure used to build a strong constructive speech.

What are inherency, plan, uniqueness, link/internal link, impact, solvency, and pre-empts?

100

You debate these — not people

What are points // arguments?

100

Listening carefully involves doing this in five specific ways.

What are the 5 listening strategies?

100

Ethos, pathos, and logos are known as this.

What is argument appeal?

200

These are the three essential components of an argument

What are claim, evidence, and warrant?

200

These arguments answer the other side before they are even made.

What are preemptive arguments?

200

These are the three types of advocacy covered in class.

What are self, individual, and systems advocacy?

200

These are the three ways to make a response.

What are refute, rebuild, and extend?

200

These are the four types of credibility you should know.

What are initial, background, halo effect, and transaction-based credibility?

300

This 6-part model includes: claim, grounds, warrant, backing, qualifer, and rebuttal

What is the Toulmin model?

300

Circumstantial, abusive, and tu quoque are all forms of this fallacy.

What is ad hominem?

300

Advocacy is nothing without this

What is action/pragmatism?

300

This approach "absorbs" information passively.

What is the sponage approach?

300

These three Cs make arguments more persuasive when delivered.

What are competence, confidence, and conviction?

400

These two parts of Toulmin work together and are considered co-constitutive. 

What are the warrant and the grounds?

400

Timeframe, magnitude, and probability are used to do this.

What is weigh an impact?

400

This debate role summarizes "they say/we say" and explains why your side still wins.

What is the rebuttal?

400

This approach asks questions and digs deeper into arguments.

What is the panning-for-gold approach?

400

This fallacy misrepresents the opposing position to make it easier to defeat.

What is the straw man fallacy?

500

This debate component is used to clarify arguments, challenge claims, gain links, and poke holes.

What is the cross-examination (CX)?

500

These are the three types of disputes (stock issues).

What are fact, value, and policy disputes?

500

This describes the number of speeches, their times, and the duties of each role in the debate.

What is debate structure?

500

These are the three ways to prepare to respond.

What are prepare in advance, adopt appropriate styles, and model fairness/courtesy?

500

This type of argument appeals primarily to audience's emotions.

What is an affective argument?