Religion
Religion pt 2
Criminal Law
Criminal Law pt 2
Crim Law pt 3
100

This case involved bus fare reimbursements for parents and incorporated the Establishment Clause

Everson v. Bd of Education Ewing Township

100

The Court in this case held that refusing unemployment compensation to someone who was fired for religious reasons violated the Free-exercise clause. Said there are two questions to ask:

1. does the state burden religion

2. does the state have a compelling interest for regulation

Sherbert v. Verner

100

The Court in this case held that during searches instant to arrest, police can only search those things that are in plain view, the immediate area, or anything the person could reach for

Chimel v. California

100

The Court in this case held that if evidence is illegally obtained, it cannot be used in court.

First introduction of the exclusionary rule in federal court

Weeks v. US

100

This case held that police must read a suspect their Miranda rights before any information from questioning can be used

Miranda v. Arizona

200

This case outlawed the mandatory reciting of bible verses in public school and established a 2-part test to see if something violates the Establishment Clause

Abingdon School District v. Schempp

200

The Court in this case held that requiring Amish children to go to school through age 16 violated the Free-Exercise Clause because Amish children are unique in that they are not closely integrated with American society

Wisconsin v. Yoder

200

The Court in this case held that the contents of cell phones can not be searched during searches instant to arrest

Riley v. California

200

The Court in this case held that wiretapping did not require a warrant and did not violate the 4th amendment because it was not a physical search

Olmsted v. US

200

This case established the Good Faith exception to the exclusionary rule. If police obtain evidence from a warrant that is later revoked, that evidence can still be used

US v. Leon

300

The Court in this case held that mandatory prayer in public schools violated the Establishment Clause

Engel v. Vitale

300

The Court in this case held that schools cannot discriminate by withholding funds for religious organizations when they provide those funds to secular ones

Rosenberger v. UVA

300

The Court in this case held that aerial surveillance of fields, backyards, etc is okay without a warrant

California v. Ciraolo

300

This case incorporated the exclusionary rule

Mapp v. Ohio

300

This case incorporated the right against self-incrimination

Malloy v. Hogan

400

The Court in this case found that prayers at public school graduation ceremonies violated the Establishment Clause because those who are not religious would feel coerced into standing and participating in the prayer

Lee v. Weisman

400

The Court in this case held that Congress cannot undo a Supreme Court ruling through passing an ordinary law that tries to alter the meaning of the clause as interpreted by the courts

City of Boerne v. Flores

400

The Court in this case held that police cannot perform a full-body search at a traffic stop unless the person is being arrested

US v. Robinson
400

The Court in this case held that a warrant was not needed to impound a vehicle, only probable cause

Carrol v. US

400

The Court in this case applied Miranda to both federal and state court

Dickerson v. US

500

The Court in this case held that the erection of religious monuments on public grounds -- when they are not ancient and not surrounded by others -- violates the Establishment Clause

McCreary v. ACLU of KY

500

The Court in this case held that when there is a neutral, generally applicable criminal law that burdens religion, it will stand. No need for the state to show a compelling interest

Oregon v. Smith

500

The Court in this case held that if police have probable cause that either the vehicle or a container within it is involved in something illegal, they do not need a warrant to search it

California v. Acevedo

500

This case overturned Olmsted and established a 2-part test for determining when a warrant is required for wiretapping

Katz v. US