Unless interference is motivated by animus towards religion or a specific belief system.
The first prong of the Establishment Clause test is:
The standard of review for a content based law is:
Strict scrutiny.
Incitement and hate speech.
The three standards of review for equal protection are.
1. Rational basis, 2. intermediate scrutiny, 3. strict scrutiny.
Under this exception, the government can regulate the use of illegal drugs, despite an impact on free exercise.
Neutral law of general applicability.
The second prong of the 3 part Establishment Clause test is:
The effect of the law must neither advance nor inhibit religion.
Rational basis.
Incitement requires:
Imminent harm, likelihood of producing illegal action, and intent to cause imminent illegal action.
To meet strict scrutiny, the government must prove.
That a law is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest.
The third prong of the 3 part test is:
The law must not foster excessive government entanglement with the establishment of religion.
Strict scrutiny.
The three part Miller test for obscenity is:
1. Tendency to cause lustful thoughts, 2. depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive manner, 3. lacks social value under national reasonable person standard.
Illegitimacy and gender.
These are two exceptions where laws can abridge free exercise.
Polygamy and use of illicit substances.
One.
This level of scrutiny applies to commercial speech that is not fraudulent or misleading.
Intermediate scrutiny.
The central hudson test for commercial speech requires that the speech isn't illegal or misleading, then 1. the government has a substantial interest, 2. the regulation must directly and materially advance the government's substantial interest, and 3. the regulation is narrowly tailored.
Name the suspect classifications.
Define fighting words.
Fighting words are words that would cause an ordinary person to react violently.
What level of scrutiny applies to political speech?
Exacting scrutiny.
Name the fundamental rights.