COSO History
Framework
Components
Random
100

When was the most recent update?

2017

100

How many components are in the COSO ERM Framework?

5

100

By reviewing entity performance, an organization can consider how well the enterprise risk management components are functioning over time and in light of substantial changes, and what revisions are needed.

Review & Revision

100

How many booms were given on the first question?

5

200

When was COSO established?

1985

200

How many principles are there?

20

200

_____sets the organization’s tone, reinforcing the importance of, and establishing oversight responsibilities for, ERM. ____ pertains to ethical values, desired behaviors, and understanding of risk in the entity.

Governance and Culture

200

The acceptable level of variation of a risk given overall risk appetite. It establishes metrics with upper and lower thresholds to monitor performance and inform whether escalation, response action and/or alteration to tolerance levels is required.

Risk Tolerance

300

What does COSO stand for?

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)

300

What does the COSO ERM Framework emphasize?

The integration of risk management with strategy and performance

300

ERM requires a continual process of obtaining and sharing necessary information, from both internal and external sources, which flows up, down, and across the organization

Information, Communication, and Reporting

300

The types and amount of risk an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its mission. It provides a consistent measure for how much risk is acceptable for an organization or a business unit in pursuit of its objectives.

Risk Appetite

400

A risk appetite is established and aligned with strategy; business objectives put strategy into practice while serving as a basis for identifying, assessing, and responding to risk.

Strategy & Objective-Setting

500

Risks that may impact the achievement of strategy and business objectives need to be identified and assessed. Risks are prioritized by severity in the context of risk appetite. The organization then selects risk responses and takes a portfolio view of the amount of risk it has assumed. The results of this process are reported to key risk stakeholders.

Performance