Case Facts
Background
Constitution
The Ruling
Significance
100

What is the name of this Supreme Court case?

Gideon v. Wainwright

100

Why didn’t Gideon have a lawyer at his trial?

 He couldn’t afford one

100

What constitutional concept is connected to this case?

Natural rights

100

Did the Supreme Court rule for Gideon or Florida?

 Gideon

100

What major right did this case establish?

The right to a lawyer for all criminal defendants

200

What year was the case decided?

1963

200

Why did the judge refuse to give him a lawyer?
 

Florida law only gave lawyers for capital cases

200

Which amendment guarantees the right to a lawyer?


The Sixth Amendment

200

What was the vote of the Court?

 9–0

200

Who benefits from this ruling?

People who cannot afford a lawyer

300

What was Clarence Gideon charged with?

Felony breaking and entering

300

What was Gideon forced to do at trial?

 Represent himself

300

Which amendment applies that right to the states?

The Fourteenth Amendment

300

What did the Court say about the Sixth Amendment?


It guarantees the right to an attorney in criminal cases

300

What system expanded because of this case?

Public defender systems

400

What state did the case come from?

Florida

400

What was the result of his first trial?

He was convicted

400

What right was Gideon arguing had been denied?

The right to an attorney

400

What did the Court say states must do?


Provide a lawyer to defendants who cannot afford one

400

What does this case protect in court?

Fair trials

500

What did Gideon do from prison to challenge his conviction?

 He handwritten a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court

500

What did Gideon argue in his petition?

That his constitutional rights were violated

500

What is the constitutional issue in this case?

Whether states must provide a lawyer to a defendant who cannot afford one

500

Why did the Court say lawyers are necessary?

To ensure a fair trial and protect liberty

500

What problem does this case prevent?

People being forced to defend themselves against trained prosecutors