DAT
Labeling Theory
Anomie
Institutional Anomie
Routine Activities Perspective
100

names associated with the theory

Sutherland

100

names associated

lumer? tannenbaum had input

100

level of analysis?

model of law?

structural theory

consensus theory

100

names associated

messner and rosenfeld

100

level of analysis

cross-level

200

level of analysis

model of law

cross-level

group-conflict

200

level of analysis

model of law

cross-level

group-conflict

200

why is the US more crime prone than other countries?

economics are dominant in american culture which causes high rates of anomie and high rates of crime

200

level of analysis?

model of law?

structural

censensus

200

what explains crime/victimization

what we do, where we go, with whom we interact

300

model of law?

group-conflict

300

primary vs secondary deviance

primary - small acts of deviance; secondary: more serious type of crime

300

anomie =

normlessness

300

what is the key argument

economics = dominant in american culture

300

necessary components: 

motivated offender: try to maximize profit and minimize cost

suitable target: proximity and exposure; target attractiveness

lack of gaurdianship: social guardianship - people (groups); physical guardianship - lights on house, security

400

Necessary components:

definitions: favorable/unfavorable

techniques: to avoid detection and increase gains

opportunities: subjective - seeing opportunities others wouldnt; objective - everyone sees it as an opportunity

400

what is the role of social structure

powerful vs. powerless

some groups are more likely to be labeled, some groups do the labeling

powerful groups label; powerless groups get labeled

400

criminologists are most concerned with which mode?

innovation

400

policy implications?

create better/stronger welfare

400

critiques

can put crime on victim, doesnt explain crime types, have to use other theories to fill in blank

500

how does criminal behavior occur?

what is the role of social structure?

through interactions with others

our position in social structure has a direct baring on who we interact with

500

policy implications?

critiques of this theory?

remove such harsh labels, keep involved in extracurriculars, hands-off

fails to explain primary deviance

500

critiques?

doesnt tell how or why people choose their various modes of adaptation

500

critiques?

not consensus about end goal, crime is not limited to lower class