Criminal Law Basics
Legal Defences
Parties to an Offence
Jury Selection
Types of Evidence
100

These are the two Latin terms that make up the equation for "a crime".

Actus Reus + Mens Rea

100

The best possible defence is _____________, a defence that places the accused somewhere else at the time the offence occurred.

an alibi

100

This is a criminal charge where you are convicted of helping someone commit a crime.

Aiding

100

This is the minimum age you can be to serve on an Ontario Jury, per the Ontario Juries Act.

18

100

Who can the Crown NOT compel to give witness testimony to in respects to Privileged Communication Evidence?

A spouse

200

The forgery of credit card information would fall under which type of criminal offence?

Hybrid Offence

200

Under Self-Defence Laws (i.e. Section 38 of the Criminal Code of Canada), you are allowed to stop a thief from taking your personal property as long as you do not strike the thief or cause _______________.

bodily harm

200

This is a criminal charge where you are convicted of encouraging someone commit a crime.

Abetting

200

What is the name of the process where the Crown and Defence Lawyers are selecting the 12 jurors to make up the jury?

Empanelling

200

Opinion Evidence is when a qualified _____________ provides information in a court case.

expert

300

The twelve jurors in a criminal case need to prove ________________ that the accused is guilty of the crime.

beyond reasonable doubt

300

If you unknowingly took five video games from the discount bin at Wal-Mart, when you only meant to take four, you could use this as a legal defence should you be caught and tried in criminal court.

Honest Mistake

300

True or False?

If you provided food or shelter to your husband, who is running from an arrest warrant, you could be convicted as an "accessory after the fact".

False

Married persons cannot be held responsible for assisting in the escape of a spouse and someone escaping with the spouse.

300

What are the two types of challenges the Crown and Defence can make when selecting jurors?

Peremptory and Challenge for Cause

300

What are the two types of confession statements?

A statement can be either inculpatory, which is an admission, or exculpatory, a denial. 

400

In the R. v. Molodowic [2000] case, Molodowic was not found criminally responsible for shooting and killing his grandfather. Why?

Molodowic was deemed not criminally responsible by defence of mental disorder.

400

Jeanine is at a house party and is walking down the stairs towards the basement. As she is walking she has a seizure and falls into Brent. Brent's head is thrust into the wall of the basement stairs, causing him to fall into a coma, and later die in hospital. What defence could Jeanine use to avoid criminal charges?

Automatism

400

What are the two things that every individual has the immediate legal right to when being arrested?

1. the reason for the arrest

2. the right to obtain a lawyer

400

Name three occupations that would dismiss you from jury duty in Ontario.

lawyers, law students, doctors, people working in law enforcement, etc.

400

Photographs will be deemed as inadmissible evidence as long as, in the eyes of the judge, that their sole objective is to simply ____________ the jury.

inflame

500

Which section of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that individuals have “to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law”?

Section 11

500

What are the three types of scenarios where "consent" can NOT be used as a legal defence?

firearms, murder, and sexual offences committed against persons under the age of 14

500

In the R. v. Richardson [2001] case, the defence argued that the police search and seizure of the 11 bags of marijuana and hashish oil was conducted illegally. The defence argued that this violated Richardson's Charter Rights, specifically Section 8 and ____________.

Section 10

500

In the R. v. Find [2001] Supreme Court of Canada ruling, the judge denied the challenge for cause as "the aim of the jury selection process is to find ______________, not favourable jurors".

impartial

500

When dealing with Similar Fact Evidence, what is a << voir dire >> ?

A mini-hearing within a trial in order to determine if evidence should be allowed (admissible) in the trial