Fundamentals
What's Enough?
Article I
Article II
Article III
100

True or False;  Entrapment is a complete defense to a criminal charge.

True.

100

Not sufficient inducement to involve entrapment (4):  Hint ASPD

Artifice, stratagem, pretense, or deceit

100

Three Types of Entrapment

1)  Entrapment by Estoppel

2)  Entrapment by Unclean Hands

3)  Entrapment as Consent

100

Topolewski v. State

Entrapment as consent case.  Left meat on a loading dock to invite theft.

100

Sentencing Entrapment Machine Gun Case

Cannon (aptly named?)
200

Elements of Entrapment

A valid entrapment defense has two related elements: (1) government inducement of the crime, and (2) the defendant's lack of predisposition to engage in the criminal conduct.

200

Maybe enough for inducement (2).

A showing of at least persuasion or mild coercion.

200

What is entrapment as estoppel?

Basically mistake of law caused by reasonable reliance on official inducement or official interpretation.

200

Raley v. Ohio

Entrapment by Estoppel case.  Told silence would shield him from conviction around Communist activities.

200

Types of Sentencing Entrapment and Manipulation

1)  Sentencing Entrapment

2)  Sentencing Manipulation

3)  Reverse Sting Operation

4)  Sentencing - Altering Specific Intent (People v. Claypool)

300

Case which cites the two elements of entrapment.

Mathews v. United States, 485 U.S. 58, 63 (1988).

300

Probably enough to establish inducement NSFP.

Pleas based on need, sympathy, or friendship, or extraordinary promises of the sort "that would blind the ordinary person to his legal duties." 

United States v. Evans, 924 F.2d 714, 717 (7th Cir. 1991).

300

What is entrapment as unclean hands?

Government sullies itself by active participation instead of passive involvement.

300

Subjective Test

Predisposition of the suspect.

300

Factors in identifying prolonging of an investigation for manipulation of a sentence.

1)  Length of time between first offense and arrest

2)  Whether there was an immediate need to arrest

3)  Whether the suspect had committed a violent offense

4)  Whether a co-conspirator was sought

5)  Whether delay would provide greater understanding of the nature of the enterprise

400

Of the two elements, which is by far the most important?

Predisposition

400

Definitely enough to show inducement.

If government's behavior was such that "a law-abiding citizen's will to obey the law could have been overborne."  

400

What is entrapment as consent? 

Leaving bait to invite crimes and lure potential offenders.

400

Objective test

Outrageous conduct by the government.

400

Imaginary drugs case.

United States v. Sanchez

500

Fill in the blank. __________ is the threshold issue in the entrapment defense. Mere solicitation to commit a crime is not __________.

Inducement

500

Case for definite entrapment.

United States v. Kelly, 748 F.2d 691, 698 (D.C. Cir. 1984).  Abscam - Arab sheik fakes.

500

United States v. Jacobson

Unclean hands case.  U.S. acted as a pornographic agent.

500

Hybrid test.

Judge adjudicates claim under objective test at pretrial.  Jury is then given the opportunity at trial to adjudicate the claim under the subjective test.

500

Russell case

Supplied with necessary ingredient to cook meth.  

Defenses:

1) No ongoing crime (gave it up)

2)  Active agent (supplied drugs)

3)  Created the crime (made the impossible possible)

4)  Induced through profits

5)  Reluctance:  Officer persistence

Prosecution:

1)  Predisposed

2)  Samples already in their possession