These preclude us from understanding the world with total objectivity and clarity; everyone has them
Seeking out ALL facts, information sources, and reasoning to support issues we intend to judge and examining them from as many sides as possible
Open-Mindedness
The presentation of a reason to support a conclusion (_____ = Reason + Conclusion)
Argument
Gender, Age, Race, Sexual affiliation/orientation, mental and physical abilities, ethnicity/culture
The four techniques of the FAIR way to creat a diverse environment
Feedback
Assistance
Inclusion
Respect
Misleading and misusing of numbers and/or false facts
Faulty Logic or Perception
Intellectual humility
Argument type based on reasonable grounds for their conclusion but will never prove its conclusion with absolute certainty (assessed in degrees of probability)
Inductive Arguments
An adverse or unreasonable opinion about a person or group without knowing all the facts and is usually based on deeply held beliefs
This reduces misunderstandings, provides clarity, and should be given early and often to subordinates and superiors?
Feedback
Using words to conceal the truth, mislead, confuse, or deceive from the true point
Use of Language
To have an independent mind and restrain from believing only because of social pressures to conform
Free Thinking
When one thing follows necessarily or is inferred from another in an argument, it is this type
Deductive argument
Socio-Behavioral Tendencies (SBTs)
Assumptions, stereotypes, social biases, perceptions, perspectives, collusion
The differences and diversity created by an organization's own structure
Organizational diversity
Psychological and Sociological Pitfalls
To have curiosity to further one's understanding and put in necessary work sufficient to evaluate multiple sides of issues
High motivation
The three parts of an argument
Conclusion, indicator, reason
Diversity characteristics that can be changed or altered depending on how a person thinks
Making sure everyone has the opportunity to fully participate in the workplace
Inclusion
Who can mitigate critical thinking hindrances?
Critical thinkers
Rationally looking for the good and bad points various sides examined of a thought/idea and maintaining the goal of getting the truth
Healthy skepticism
Good information sources for arguments are...?
Credible, unbiased, and accurate
The AFI that governs and states that the enlisted force is a diverse group of functional and operational professionals
Recognizing each person's unique value, contributions, and potential to the orgnization
Respect