Cyberbullying & Motives
Risk factors & Roles
Cyberlifestyle & RAC Theory
Victims & Consequences
Prevention & Solutions
100

What is a common motivation for cyberbullying described by Rafferty & Vander Ven?

Revenge, humor, jealousy, and social dominance.


100

What three groups did Mishna et al. study in their research ?

Victims, bullies, and bully-victims.

100

What are the three main elements of Routine Actvities Theory?

Motivated offender, suitable target, and a lack of a capable guardian.

100

Name an emotional impact/symptom of being cyberbullied.

Anxiety, depression, isolation, and fear.

100

How can one reduce online risks?

Increase the strength of privacy settings and limit sharing.
200

How does anonymity encourage cyberbullying behaviors?

It increases boldness and reduces the likelihood of accountability. i.e. "Would someone say this to someone in real life?"

200

Name one personal risk factor for becoming a victim.

Low self-esteem, social isolation, and high internet usage.

200
How did Reyns et al. adapt RAT to online enviornments?

Created Cyberlifestyle RAC Theory (CL-RAT)

200

How does cyberstalking differ from regular online harassment?

It is persistent, involves targeting, and unwanted pursuits.

200
How does anonymity influence cyberbullying behavior?

Re

300

How does peer influence play a part in online aggression?

Group validation can encourage participation.

300

What makes "bully-victims" stand out?

They both experience and perpetrate bullying. Which means they often have more severe emotional difficulties. 

300

Give one example of a "suitable target" online.

Someone who shares private information, accepts all friend requests, and posts frequently.

300

What psychological toll is especially high for bullying victims?

Guilt, confusion, and internal conflict.

300

How might peer intervention help reduce online aggression?

Bystanders calling out harmful behavior to deter possible bullies.

400

How does college culture contribute to online hostility?

Status and social comparisons fuel aggression.

400

How can the family environment influence cyberbullying involvement?

Conflict or low parental supervision increases risk.

400

What counts as a "capable guardian" online?

Privacy settings, platform monitoring, and supportive peers.

400

Why might cyberstalking be underreported among students?

Victims normalize it, fear of embarrassment, or doubt of police response.
400

What is the danger of focusing on only victim behavior in preventing cyberbullying?

It creates more space for victim blaming and ignoring systemic issues.

500

Why would cyberbullying feel less real to the perpetrators? i.e. Why would this act feel harmless to them?

The digital distance reduces empathy and emotional awareness.

500

What combination of traits is the most predicted bully behavior?

Aggression, peer problems, and high time online.

500

How might one's online routine increase victimization risk?

Frequent public posting or engaging with strangers raises exposure.

500

How can online aggression affect academic or social livelihood?

Decreased performance, avoidance of online spaces, and withdrawl.

500

Combine insights from all three articles: What would make a strong campus prevention model?

1. Education on digital routines ( from CL-RAT) 2. addressing emotional risk (from Mishna) and 3. empathy-based awareness (from Rafferty & Vander Ven)