Motion Analysis
Argumentation
Refutation
Case Building
Random
1

What is the 'motion'?

The topic or subject that the debate is about

1
Is the more arguments you have the better?

No, quality > quantity

1
Do you need to refute every single thing your opponent says?

No, prioritise the strongest arguments, or arguments that have not been taken down

1

As Opposition, what must you do to challenge Prop's definition?

1st Opp speaker must reject the definition, explain why it is faulty, and provide an alternative def
1

Where do states get their funds from?

Taxes, State-Owned Enterprises

2

What kind of motions require a policy?

Motions that involve an action

2

What are the components of an argument?

Assertion, Reasoning, Example, Impact

2

True or False: 1st Proposition speaker does not need to think about rebuttals at all

False: They should pre-empt responses in their speech, and ask POIs

2

True or False: Opposition should never say that Proposition's policy might work

False:  Opposition can assume prop's policy will solve the problem but cause even bigger harms

2

What do you call the ideology where all citizens are equal, with absolute state control over all allocation of resources?

Communism

3

What is the difference between "THW Prioritise Nuclear Energy" and "TH, as China, would Prioritise Nuclear Energy"?

The latter is an actor motion that takes the perspective of China

3

THP Climate Adaptation over Climate Mitigation

True or False: Both sides should argue that they completely solve climate change

False: Both sides should acknowledge they are imperfect but claim that they are better than the other

3

What are the 3 main types of refutation?

Underlying assumption, Logic, Counterconsideration

3

Why should you always include an explanation of the motion or status quo in your setup?

To help contextualise/narrow down what the debate is about

3

What is the main promise in the Hipprocratic Oath?

To do no harm

4

What is the difference between "TH Opposes Social Media" and "TH Regrets the Popularity of Social Media"?

The regret motion requires explanation of what the world would look like if social media was never popular

4

How do incentive structures help you prove your claim?

By showing that a particular actor is highly likely, not just possibly, going to react a certain way

4

How do i use multiple layers of responses without contradicting myself or sounding inconsistent?

Using the 'Even-If' approach, or giving the other team benefit of doubt

4

"THW Ban all animal testing"

If Opp gives a counter prop of "regulation instead of banning", should Prop rebut by saying regulation will fail because governments are corrupt? 

No, because if governments are corrupt then they would not be able to enforce the ban effectively either

4

What is the main difference between a judge and jury?

judges are trained, judges do verdict & sentencing, judges do not have to be unanimous

5

"TH Supports the Dominant Narrative that Patience is a Virtue"

As Opposition, what should your stance on this narrative be?

It has some benefits as a narrative, but just not a dominant one

5

What is a main strategy for demonstrating impact of your argument?

Emphasizing the scale of benefit (to many people), or the magnitude (extent of benefit to some people), or how it helps the most vulnerable/important stakeholder
5

Motion: THW give men leadership positions in feminist organisations

Prop: Men will not support the organisations if they are not allowed to be leaders.

How Opposition flip this argument?

If men who will only support feminist organisations because they are in leadership do not support us, that is better, bc these men expose themselves as misogynists, so we are better off without them trying to hijack the cause.

5

"THP a world without lying"

As Opposition, what should you try to prove?

Lying is not good, but it is necessary for the safety and survival of oppressed peoples. (e.g. women trying to escape abusive situations/danger)

5

What does the "Evergreening of Patents" mean?

Making slight modifications to renew patents that allow companies to continuously avoid competition