Kinds of rules
The norm or what is typical
Expectation
Please put in order of the steps in staging
Observations
resolution analysis
define terms
state criteria
attention getting device
read resolution
2. read resolution
3.resolution analysis
4.define terms
5. state criteria
6. observations
simply true by definitions
Tautology
how the world is
fact
concerns praise and blame in a present moment that calls for recognition of a party deserving of credit or censure
Epideictic
Arbitrary but official rules
Fiat
define the term What, how, how much, how certain
state criteria
not true by definition, but is so lacking in controversy that there is no point in debating it; no one would object to it
truism
how the world is, and a judgment about it
value
was for the assembly (policy-making portion of government).
Deliberative
Rules that must be followed on irrationality
Necessity
define what type of resolution is being debated and offers justification for that claim.
- fact, value, and policy, quasi-policy
Resolution Analysis
the affirmative does something unreasonable in debate
Abuse
how the world is, offer a judgment about it, and tell us what to do about it
policy
for the courtroom and focused on questions of past fact
Forensic
what is
Trust in the process, concerned with fairness, assigning burgers, structuring the interaction, “refereeing”
pragma dialectis
define
Structural expectation in academic debate
Many debates are either won or lost in this step
If the affirmative denies their right to define, it is passed to the negative, where the negative can define it to benefit their case
Define Terms
please state which is truism or tautology
1.If something is true, then it is true.
2.All bachelors are unmarried men.”
3.Either it will rain tomorrow, or it won’t.
4.Honesty is the best policy.
5. Life is full of ups and downs.
6.Hard work often leads to success.
1.tautology
2.tautology
3.tautology
4.truism
5.truism
6.truism
define “A Proposition of Policy is simply a Proposition of Value extended into the future.”
Policies do NOT exist without Values.
please tell me which goes to which
match these
1.Debate Textbooks
2.Proposition of Fact
3.Proposition of Value
4. Proposition of Policy
to these
1.Forensic
2.Deliberative
3.Aristotle
4.Epideictic
1.1 and 4
2. 2 and 1
3. 4 and 2
4. 3 and 4
please answer which is fiat, expectation and necessity Hint: one answer is a combnation of 2
1.Prima facia
2. constructive vs. rebuttals
3. affirmative speaks first and last
1. necessity
2.fiat and expectation
3.fiat
define
Background facts
Defensive arguments
Negatives should pay close attention to them
Observations
please state tautology or truism
1.Money can’t buy happiness.
2.A triangle has three sides.
3.Whatever will be, will be
4.Time waits for no one.
5.Either the team will win, or they won’t.
1.truism
2.tautology
3.tautology
4.truism
5.tautology
what two type of argument styles are these
Arguments styles
Win/Lose - Competing
Win/Win - Collaborating - not possible in a realistic conflict
Lose/Lose - Avoiding
Lose/Win - Accommodating
½ Win ½ Lose - Compromising
Realistic and Non-Realistic Conflict
which is Propositions of Fact, Propositions of Value, Propositions of Policy and Quasi-Policy
1.
A policy resolution specifies an action that should allegedly be taken
Values imply Policies
2.The central feature of a proposition of fact is that it only asserts the way the world “is” and not how the world “ought to be”.
3.
propositions are propositions that express a value judgement about a policy.
4.
Value resolutions indicate that a state of affairs is good/bad or right/wrong.
Offer judgments
1.Propositions of Policy
2. propostions of fact
3. quasi-policy
4. propositions of value