Fallacies
Cognitive Bias
Debate Case Structure
Strategy
WILD CARD
100

A logical fallacy is best described as:

A mistake in reasoning that weakens an argument

100

a systematic error in thinking that occurs when people are processing and interpreting information in the world around them and affects the decisions and judgments that they make.

cognitive bias 

100

What does CER stand for?

Claim Evidence Reasoning 

100

The three rhetorical appeals

ethos pathos logos

100

A claim supported by evidence and reasoning is known as a:

argument 

200

When someone attacks the person instead of the argument, it's called a(n):

Ad Hominem 

200

How much you like someone or how attractive you think they are can change your perspective. 

Halo Effect 

200

Any information, data, or example that supports a claim, argument, or belief. It helps prove, strengthen, or justify what someone is saying.

Evidence 

200
Always, Everyone, Only, All, None, Must; are all examples of.....________

Absolutes 

200

"You should trust me because I’ve worked here for 10 years." is an example of which rhetorical appeal?

Ethos

300

"If we allow students to retake one test, next they’ll expect to retake every test. Then they’ll want to redo homework, and eventually no one will take deadlines seriously at all!" is an example of which fallacy.

Slippery Slope 

300

How information is curated and presented can change your opinion or reaction. 

Framing Effect 

300

Responding to your opponent's argument directly is called

Rebuttal

300

What is the main goal of cross-examination in a debate?

To clarify, expose weaknesses, or challenge the opponent’s case

300

Why is “flowing” an important strategy during a debate?

It allows you to track arguments and respond effectively in later speeches

400

correlation does not equal causation

false cause fallacy 

400

A natural association occurs by the order in which information is presented.  

Anchoring 

400

The goal of the final focus speech in Public Forum is to do what?

Answer the question: Why should I win this debate? 

400

You and your opponents must agree upon definitions to avoid arguing ________.

semantics

400

The two most common types of debates are...

policy and value 

500

This is a conclusion that is based on insufficient evidence or information. This logical fallacy is committed when a conclusion is drawn from a hurried study of insufficient evidence.

Hasty Generalization 

500

When we see news reports about homicides, child abductions, and other terrible crimes it can make us believe that these events are much more common and threatening to us than is actually the case.

Availability Heuristic

500

Describe the principle of utilitarianism.

Choosing the action that produces the greatest good for the greatest number

500

1. Which of the following is an example of the "magnitude" weighing strategy in a debate?
A) Arguing that the issue is likely to occur soon, making it urgent to address
B) Comparing the importance of the argument to a larger issue, such as economic stability or human rights
C) Focusing on which argument has the best evidence supporting it
D) Choosing to focus on a side issue that might sway the judge's emotions

B) Comparing the importance of the argument to a larger issue, such as economic stability or human rights

500

Why is it risky to ignore an opponent’s strong point in your rebuttal?
A) It saves time for your summary
B) It shows you're focusing only on your best arguments
C) It allows the opponent's point to stand unchallenged
D) It creates suspense for the judges

C) It allows the opponent's point to stand unchallenged