Contention & Argument Structure
Rebuttal This
Offense/Defense
Off Case Arguments
100

List the parts of An Affirmative Contention/Advantage

Aff Uniqueness/Significance, Harms, Internal Link, Impact, Solvency

100

These serve to remind your judge what are the most essential arguments and warrants they should have understood from the constructive.

Extensions and/or Overviews

100

When you argue the opposite of an opponents claim.

Turn

100

A Negative argument that works to prove how the action of affirming the resolution or plan and changing the status quo will cause bad things to happen.

Disadvantage

200

List the Parts of an individual argument

Claim, Warrant, Impact, Evidence

200

When you read a single card or make a single analytical argument to answer an opponents argument

Block

200

Case Turns,Link Turns,  Impact turns,Internal Link turns, and Case/Impacts Outweigh arguments, are all Offense or Defense?

Offense

200

A Negative position that objects to the affirmative through the use of critical theory or social justice, unlike the counter plan this off case argument has an "alternative".

Kritiks

300

DAILY DOUBLE:With the exception of Evidence is the following a complete argument? "We should eat sushi for the rest of our lives because sushi is delicious while being healthy."

No because its missing an impact

300

Magnitude, Timeframe, Probability are all ways to. . . 

Weigh and Compare Impacts

300

Non Unique, No Link, No internal link, no impact and solvency deficit  arguments, are all Offense or Defense?

Defense

300

A Negative plan that acts as  a counter option to what the affirmative plan has presented.

Counter Plans

400

List the parts of a Negative Contention/Disadvantage

Uniqueness, Link, Internal Link, Impact

400

A Pre-prepared response to an opponents contention with multiple cards and analytical arguments

Frontline

400

True or False: Offense is better than defense if you are trying to win a debate.

False!

400

This Off Case argument centers around the meaning of the words in the resolution and whether or not the affirmatives case or plan is consistent with the best interpretation of those words.

Topicality

500

To persuade by credibility , to persuade by logic, and to persuade by emotion.

Ethos, Logos, Pathos

500

In order to effectively structure your final focus you . .

 Identify What is your best arg why you win what is your opponents best argument and even if that argument is true or persuasive why they still don't win the debate, and why voting for the opposing side makes things worse.

500
When the affirmative or negative advocates for two contradictory offensive arguments (i.e. advocating a link turn and impact turn during the same speech)

Double Turn

500

This deals with the "status" of an advocacy and means the negative can not commit to a counter plan or kritik

Conditionality