Types of syllogism
If A then B, A therefore B
Categorical syllogism
Define a direct attack
Denying the knowledge of the claim
All or nothing
Always valid or invalid
Deductive logic
evaluates
perscriptive argument
Reasoning-evidence-claim
Basic model
if A then B, If B then C, Therefore, If A then C
Hypothetical syllogism
define a indirect attack
does not deny the knowledge of the claim
the relations between premisies fit logically
formal validity
only describes
descriptive argument
Data-warrant-claim
Toulman
Either A or B, Not A therefore, B
Disjunctive syllogism
3 types of a direct attack
ill-informed
incorrect
incoherent
the coonclusion of the argument is true
Material Truth
process/applied goal=persuassion
rhetorical argument
major premise-minor premise-claim
aristole
Major premise- all men are mortal
minor premise- socrates is a man
claim- socrates will die
Aristotelian syllogism
inadmissable
irrelavant
inconsistent
insignificant
Strong vs Weak
bottom up
inductive
process/applied goal=fairness
dialectical argument
simple-convergent-serial-divergent
beardsley
Name all four types of categorical syllogism
Modus tollens
modus ponens
denying the antecedent
affirming the consequent
3 ways of answering without attacking
table
stipulate
concede
valid vs invalid
top down
deductive
process/abstract goal=validity
logical argument
This set of arguments includes:
A framework built on claim, reason, evidence, and conclusion.
A persuasive model using credibility, emotion, and logic.
A structure with claim, grounds, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal.
A logical chain of premises leading to a conclusion.
Identify each argument model in order.
What is the Basic Model of Argument?
What is Aristotle’s Model?
What is the Toulmin Model of Argument?
What is Beardsley’s Argument Structure?