Background
Methodology
Main Findings
General Information
100

What is the educational strategy questioned in terms of its effectiveness compared to direct instruction?

Discovery Learning

100

What process was used to distribute the children into either condition?

Randomization

100

What kind of instruction was found more effective for children when assessing science fair posters?

Direct Instruction

100

What grades were the children in?

Grade 3 and 4

200

What is the specific scientific concept the experimenters are providing instruction on?

Control-of-variable strategy

200

Which variable could the children could adjust to either high or low?

The steepness of the ramp

200

What type of instruction should teachers use based on this research?

A mixed approach of teaching

200

What was being evaluated by the children on the second day?

Science-fair posters

300

What broad skill do the authors of the study hope to impact though the teaching methods they are evaluating?

Real-world skills (e.g. evaluating other scientific research -- science-fair projects)

300

What was the process used to control for order / carryover effects?

Counterbalancing

300

What type of instruction makes it easier for children to become CVS masters?

Direct Instruction

300

What does CVS stands for?

Control-of-variable strategy

400

What is the focus of this study?

Comparing the effectiveness of discovery learning vs direct instruction in science education, particularly in learning the control of variables strategy (CVS)

400

What action was done by the experimenter to control for potential differences in reading ability during the science-fair poster evaluations?

The experimenter read the posters aloud to the children

400

What type of instruction used to learn CVS helps children make better scientific judgements?

Mastering CVS, regardless of the instruction type

400

Whose study was the theory-evidence gap a part of?

Dean & Kuhn (2006)